Yield and Yield Advantage of the Component Crops as Affected by Strip Intercropping of Coffee (<i>Coffea arabica</i> L.) with Pineapple (<i>Ananas comosus</i> L.)

Leta Ajema; Ashenafi Nigussie

doi:doi:10.11648/j.ajbio.20210904.11

| Peer-Reviewed

Yield and Yield Advantage of the Component Crops as Affected by Strip Intercropping of Coffee (Coffea arabica L.) with Pineapple (Ananas comosus L.)

Leta Ajema, Ashenafi Nigussie

Published in American Journal of BioScience (Volume 9, Issue 4)

Received: 23 April 2021 Accepted: 30 June 2021 Published: 7 July 2021

Views: Downloads:

Download PDF

Share This Article

Twitter
Linked In
Facebook

Abstract

Intercropping has a number of advantages over mono-cropping production system, which has significant problems and that there are sufficient justification for studying intercropping approaches. Consequently, researchers have proposed a systematic intercropping approach to evaluate the benefits of strip intercropping in terms of yield advantage, economic return, yield stability, pest control, nutrient use efficiency, etc. However, because of these advantages, intercropping is practiced in many parts of the world, especially in developing countries like Ethiopia. A field experiment was conducted at Awada Agriculture Research Sub-center during 2012 and 2019 to evaluate the effect of strip intercropping ratios of coffee with pineapple on the yield and yield components of both crops and to determine economically optimum coffee to pineapple strip intercropping ratio for the study area. The experiment was laid out in a randomized complete block design with three replications. Coffee variety (Fayate) and Smooth Cayenne Pineapple variety were used. The experiment was comprised five treatments: sole coffee, sole Pineapple, 1C:1, 1:2, and 1:3 ratio of coffee with pineapple. The pooled mean analysis revealed that the sole planted coffee and pineapple were produced statically highest yields in contrast with other intercropped treatments. Regarding strip intercropping treatments, the highest and lowest clean coffee yield were recorded at 1C:1P (1289 kg ha^-1) and 1C:2P (1128 kg ha^-1) treatments. The highest total land equivalent ratio was recorded at 1C:3P (1.50), closely followed by 4C:1P (1.36), 1C:1P (1.32), and 1C:2P (1.23) or a relative yield advantage of 23 to 50% was obtained from the coffee-Pineapple strip intercropping treatments. Therefore, this finding recommend that strip intercropping of coffee with pineapple at 1C:3P ratio is a viable option for sustainable productivity in yield and yield profit to farmers as revealed by the highest total LER.

Published in	American Journal of BioScience (Volume 9, Issue 4)
DOI	10.11648/j.ajbio.20210904.11
Page(s)	116-121
Creative Commons	This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited.
Copyright	Copyright © The Author(s), 2021. Published by Science Publishing Group

Keywords

Arabica Coffee, Pineapple, LER, Strip-Intercropping

References

[1]	Garedew, W., Lemessa, F., & Pinard, F. (2017). Assessment of berry drop due to coffee berry disease and non CBD factors in Arabica coffee under farmer’s fields of Southwestern Ethiopia. Crop Protection. 98: 276–282.
[2]	Berecha, G., Aerts, R., Vandepitte, K., Van Glabeke, S., Muys, B., I., & Honnay, O. (2014). Effects of forest management on mating patterns, pollen flow and intergenerational transfer of genetic diversity in wild arabica coffee (Coffea arabica L.) from afromontane rainforests. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society. 112 (1): 76–88.
[3]	Van der Vossen, H., Bertrand, B., & Charrier, A. (2015). Next generation variety development for sustainable production of arabica coffee (coffea arabica L.): A review. Euphytica, 204 (2): 243–256.
[4]	International Monetary Fund (2016). Article consultation—press release; staff report; and statement by the executive director for the federal democratic Republic Of Ethiopia. IMF Country Report No. 16/322, October 2016.
[5]	Labouisse, J. P., Bellachew, B., Kotecha, S., & Bertrand, B. (2008). Current status of coffee (Coffea arabica L.) genetic resources in Ethiopia: Implications for conservation. Genetic Resources and Crop Evolution, 55 (7): 1079–1093.
[6]	International Coffee Organization [ICO]. (2015). World coffee market. ICO annual review Retrieved November 2016. http://www.ico.org/. International Coffee Organization, 222 Gray's Inn Road, London WC1X 8HB.
[7]	Boansi, D., & Crentsil, C. (2013). Competitiveness and determinants of coffee exports, producer price and production for Ethiopia. Journal of Advanced Research in Economics and International Business 1. (1): 31–56.
[8]	Midega, C. A. O., Salifu, D., Bruce, T. J. A., Pittchar, J., Pickett, J. A. and Khan, Z. R. (2014). Cumulative effects and economic benefits of intercropping maize with food legumes on Striga hermonthica infestation. Field Crops Research. 155, pp. 144-152. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fcr.2013.09.012
[9]	Tsubo M, Walker S, Ogindo HO. (2005). A simulation model of cereal–legume intercropping systems for semi-arid regions: Model development. Field Crops Research. 93 (1): 10-22.
[10]	Banik P, Midya A, Sarkar BK, Ghose SS. (2006). Wheat and chickpea intercropping. European Journal of Agronomy. 24 (4): 325-332.
[11]	Matusso JMM, Mugwe JN, Mucheru-Muna M. (2012). Potential role of cereal-legume intercropping systems in integrated soil fertility management in smallholder farming systems of sub-Saharan Africa Research Application Summary. Third RUFORUM Biennial Meeting 24-28 September 2012, Entebbe, Uganda.
[12]	Knudsen MT, Hauggaard-Nielsen H, Joernsgaard B, Jensen ES. (2004). Comparison of interspecific competition and N use in pea–barley, faba bean–barley and lupin–barley intercrops grown at two temperate locations. The Journal of Agricultural Science. 142 (06): 617-627.
[13]	Birhanu T, (2017). Ethiopian coffee sector strategy and future prospects, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.
[14]	Central Statistical Agency (CSA). (2017). Area under production of major crops. Statistical bulletin, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.
[15]	Damenu, T., Coffee production and marketing in Oromiya. In: Girma, A., Bayetta, B., Tesfaye, S., Endale, T. and Taye, K. (2008). Coffee Diversity and Knowledge. Proceedings of a National Workshop Four Decades of Coffee Research and Development in Ethiopia, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia, 485.
[16]	Van Asten P., Wairegi, L., Mukasa, D. and Uringi, N., (2011). Agronomic and economic benefits of coffee-banana intercropping in Uganda’s smallholder farming systems. Agricultural Systems, 104: 326–334.
[17]	Hossain M, (2016). World Pineapple Production: African Journal of Food, Agriculture, Nutritional and Development. 16 (4): 1684-1691.
[18]	Gezehagn G, Zerihun D, Tariku O, (2019). Value Chain Analysis of Pineapple (Ananas Comosus) Production and Marketing from Traditional Agroforestry System, Southern Ethiopia. Food Science and Quality Management www.iiste.org 84: 2224-6088.
[19]	Shamil A; Abebe G; Dereje G; Wakjira G (2019). Evaluation of Pineapple (Ananas comosus L.) Varieties at Teppi, South Western Ethiopia. Greener Journal of Agricultural Sciences 9 (4): 357-360 https://doi.org/10.15580/GJAS.2019.4.032619053.
[20]	Central Statistical Agency (CSA). (2014). Area under production of major crops. Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.
[21]	Mesfin K, and Bayetta B, (2005). Genetic Divergence of Harragie coffee (Coffea arabica L.). Germplasm accessions at pre- bearing stage. On coffee ASIC, Montpellier, France.
[22]	Hermann D, Carole A, Kilovis F, Ndoumou D (2013) Impact of effective and indigenous microorganisms’ manures on Colocassia esculenta and enzymes activities. Afri J Agric Res 8: 1086-1092.
[23]	Tewodros M, Tadesse E, Getachew W, Mesfin S, Addisu B 2014. Pineapple production, postharvest utilization and marketing, production manual, Amharic version, EIAR.
[24]	IAR 1996. Progress and annual reports of Jimma agricultural research center, Jimma, Ethiopia.
[25]	Mesfin Kebede & Bayetta Bellachew (2008). Phenotypic diversity in the Harerge coffee (Coffee arabica L.) germplasm for quantitative traits. East African Journal of Sciences. 2: 13-18.
[26]	Amosu S. A and S. O. S. Akinyemi (2019). Impact of Tillage and Plant Spacing of Pineapple (Ananas comosus L. Meer CV Smooth Cayenne) on the Physical Properties of an Alfisol in Ibadan Nigeria By Fruits and Spices Department National Horticultural Research Institute (NIHORT), P. M. B. 5432, Jericho Reservation Area, Idi-Ishin, Jericho, Ibadan, Nigeria.
[27]	Willey, R., (1985). Evaluation and presentation of intercropping advantages. Experimental Agriculture, 21: 119-133.
[28]	Yacob E, Tesfaye S, Alemseged Y, Anteneh N, Takele N, Mohammednur A, Bekele B. (1996). Advances in coffee agronomy research in Ethiopia. 40-45p.
[29]	Baruwa OI (2013). Profitability and constraints of pineapple production in Osun State, Nigeria. Journal of Horticultural Research 21 (2): 59-64.
[30]	Abdulfeta Kifle (2018). Characterization and Yield Performance Evaluation of Coffee (Coffea Arabica L.) germplasm Accessions from Tepi, Southwestern Ethiopia. M.Sc. Thesis Hawassa University College of Agriculture Hawassa, Ethiopia June, 2018.
[31]	Zhang, G., Yang, Z. and Dong, S., (2011). Interspecific competitiveness affects the total biomass yield in an alfalfa and corn intercropping system. Field Crops Res., 124 (1): 66-73.
[32]	Thayamini H. and Brintha, I., (2010). Review on maize based intercropping. Journal of agronomy, 9 (3): 135-145.
[33]	Taye, K., Anteneh, N., Tesfaye, S., Endale, T. and Alemseged, Y., (2008). Intercropping coffee with other crops. In: Girma, A., Bayetta, B., Tesfaye, S., Endale, T. and Taye, K. (Ed.). Coffee Diversity and Knowledge. Proceedings of a National Workshop Four Decades of Coffee Research and Development in Ethiopia. Addis Ababa, 485.
[34]	Anteneh N, Behailu M, Essubalew G, Shiferaw T, Tesfaye S,, (2020). Intercropping of Coffee with Enset (Enset ventricosum Welw. Cheesman) at Teppi, Southwestern Ethiopia. Intercropping of Coffee with Enset (Enset ventricosum Welw. Cheesman) at Teppi, Southwestern Ethiopia. International Journal of Research Studies in Agricultural Sciences. 6 8: 2020, PP 15-22.
[35]	Tewodros M, Mesfin S, Getachew W, Ashenafi A, Neim S (2018). Effect of Inorganic N and P Fertilizers on Fruit Yield and Yield Components of Pineapple (Annanas comosus MERR L. Var. Smooth cayanne) at Jimma, Southwest Ethiopia. Agrotechnology 7: 1 DOI: 10.4172/2168-9881.1000178.

Cite This Article

Plain Text BibTeX RIS

APA Style

Leta Ajema, Ashenafi Nigussie. (2021). Yield and Yield Advantage of the Component Crops as Affected by Strip Intercropping of Coffee (Coffea arabica L.) with Pineapple (Ananas comosus L.). American Journal of BioScience, 9(4), 116-121. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajbio.20210904.11

Copy | Download

ACS Style

Leta Ajema; Ashenafi Nigussie. Yield and Yield Advantage of the Component Crops as Affected by Strip Intercropping of Coffee (Coffea arabica L.) with Pineapple (Ananas comosus L.). Am. J. BioScience 2021, 9(4), 116-121. doi: 10.11648/j.ajbio.20210904.11

Copy | Download

AMA Style

Leta Ajema, Ashenafi Nigussie. Yield and Yield Advantage of the Component Crops as Affected by Strip Intercropping of Coffee (Coffea arabica L.) with Pineapple (Ananas comosus L.). Am J BioScience. 2021;9(4):116-121. doi: 10.11648/j.ajbio.20210904.11

Copy | Download

@article{10.11648/j.ajbio.20210904.11,
  author = {Leta Ajema and Ashenafi Nigussie},
  title = {Yield and Yield Advantage of the Component Crops as Affected by Strip Intercropping of Coffee (Coffea arabica L.) with Pineapple (Ananas comosus L.)},
  journal = {American Journal of BioScience},
  volume = {9},
  number = {4},
  pages = {116-121},
  doi = {10.11648/j.ajbio.20210904.11},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajbio.20210904.11},
  eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.ajbio.20210904.11},
  abstract = {Intercropping has a number of advantages over mono-cropping production system, which has significant problems and that there are sufficient justification for studying intercropping approaches. Consequently, researchers have proposed a systematic intercropping approach to evaluate the benefits of strip intercropping in terms of yield advantage, economic return, yield stability, pest control, nutrient use efficiency, etc. However, because of these advantages, intercropping is practiced in many parts of the world, especially in developing countries like Ethiopia. A field experiment was conducted at Awada Agriculture Research Sub-center during 2012 and 2019 to evaluate the effect of strip intercropping ratios of coffee with pineapple on the yield and yield components of both crops and to determine economically optimum coffee to pineapple strip intercropping ratio for the study area. The experiment was laid out in a randomized complete block design with three replications. Coffee variety (Fayate) and Smooth Cayenne Pineapple variety were used. The experiment was comprised five treatments: sole coffee, sole Pineapple, 1C:1, 1:2, and 1:3 ratio of coffee with pineapple. The pooled mean analysis revealed that the sole planted coffee and pineapple were produced statically highest yields in contrast with other intercropped treatments. Regarding strip intercropping treatments, the highest and lowest clean coffee yield were recorded at 1C:1P (1289 kg ha-1) and 1C:2P (1128 kg ha-1) treatments. The highest total land equivalent ratio was recorded at 1C:3P (1.50), closely followed by 4C:1P (1.36), 1C:1P (1.32), and 1C:2P (1.23) or a relative yield advantage of 23 to 50% was obtained from the coffee-Pineapple strip intercropping treatments. Therefore, this finding recommend that strip intercropping of coffee with pineapple at 1C:3P ratio is a viable option for sustainable productivity in yield and yield profit to farmers as revealed by the highest total LER.},
 year = {2021}
}

Copy | Download

TY  - JOUR
T1  - Yield and Yield Advantage of the Component Crops as Affected by Strip Intercropping of Coffee (Coffea arabica L.) with Pineapple (Ananas comosus L.)
AU  - Leta Ajema
AU  - Ashenafi Nigussie
Y1  - 2021/07/07
PY  - 2021
N1  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajbio.20210904.11
DO  - 10.11648/j.ajbio.20210904.11
T2  - American Journal of BioScience
JF  - American Journal of BioScience
JO  - American Journal of BioScience
SP  - 116
EP  - 121
PB  - Science Publishing Group
SN  - 2330-0167
UR  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajbio.20210904.11
AB  - Intercropping has a number of advantages over mono-cropping production system, which has significant problems and that there are sufficient justification for studying intercropping approaches. Consequently, researchers have proposed a systematic intercropping approach to evaluate the benefits of strip intercropping in terms of yield advantage, economic return, yield stability, pest control, nutrient use efficiency, etc. However, because of these advantages, intercropping is practiced in many parts of the world, especially in developing countries like Ethiopia. A field experiment was conducted at Awada Agriculture Research Sub-center during 2012 and 2019 to evaluate the effect of strip intercropping ratios of coffee with pineapple on the yield and yield components of both crops and to determine economically optimum coffee to pineapple strip intercropping ratio for the study area. The experiment was laid out in a randomized complete block design with three replications. Coffee variety (Fayate) and Smooth Cayenne Pineapple variety were used. The experiment was comprised five treatments: sole coffee, sole Pineapple, 1C:1, 1:2, and 1:3 ratio of coffee with pineapple. The pooled mean analysis revealed that the sole planted coffee and pineapple were produced statically highest yields in contrast with other intercropped treatments. Regarding strip intercropping treatments, the highest and lowest clean coffee yield were recorded at 1C:1P (1289 kg ha-1) and 1C:2P (1128 kg ha-1) treatments. The highest total land equivalent ratio was recorded at 1C:3P (1.50), closely followed by 4C:1P (1.36), 1C:1P (1.32), and 1C:2P (1.23) or a relative yield advantage of 23 to 50% was obtained from the coffee-Pineapple strip intercropping treatments. Therefore, this finding recommend that strip intercropping of coffee with pineapple at 1C:3P ratio is a viable option for sustainable productivity in yield and yield profit to farmers as revealed by the highest total LER.
VL  - 9
IS  - 4
ER  -

Copy | Download

Author Information

Leta Ajema

Ethiopian Institutes of Agricultural Research, Wando Genet Agricultural Research Center, Awada Research Sub-Center, Yirgalem, Ethiopia
Ashenafi Nigussie

Ethiopian Institutes of Agricultural Research, Wondo Genet Agriculture Research Center, Shashemene, Ethiopia

Download PDF

Sections

Plain Text BibTeX RIS

APA Style

Leta Ajema, Ashenafi Nigussie. (2021). Yield and Yield Advantage of the Component Crops as Affected by Strip Intercropping of Coffee (Coffea arabica L.) with Pineapple (Ananas comosus L.). American Journal of BioScience, 9(4), 116-121. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajbio.20210904.11

Copy | Download

ACS Style

Leta Ajema; Ashenafi Nigussie. Yield and Yield Advantage of the Component Crops as Affected by Strip Intercropping of Coffee (Coffea arabica L.) with Pineapple (Ananas comosus L.). Am. J. BioScience 2021, 9(4), 116-121. doi: 10.11648/j.ajbio.20210904.11

Copy | Download

AMA Style

Leta Ajema, Ashenafi Nigussie. Yield and Yield Advantage of the Component Crops as Affected by Strip Intercropping of Coffee (Coffea arabica L.) with Pineapple (Ananas comosus L.). Am J BioScience. 2021;9(4):116-121. doi: 10.11648/j.ajbio.20210904.11

Copy | Download

@article{10.11648/j.ajbio.20210904.11,
  author = {Leta Ajema and Ashenafi Nigussie},
  title = {Yield and Yield Advantage of the Component Crops as Affected by Strip Intercropping of Coffee (Coffea arabica L.) with Pineapple (Ananas comosus L.)},
  journal = {American Journal of BioScience},
  volume = {9},
  number = {4},
  pages = {116-121},
  doi = {10.11648/j.ajbio.20210904.11},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajbio.20210904.11},
  eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.ajbio.20210904.11},
  abstract = {Intercropping has a number of advantages over mono-cropping production system, which has significant problems and that there are sufficient justification for studying intercropping approaches. Consequently, researchers have proposed a systematic intercropping approach to evaluate the benefits of strip intercropping in terms of yield advantage, economic return, yield stability, pest control, nutrient use efficiency, etc. However, because of these advantages, intercropping is practiced in many parts of the world, especially in developing countries like Ethiopia. A field experiment was conducted at Awada Agriculture Research Sub-center during 2012 and 2019 to evaluate the effect of strip intercropping ratios of coffee with pineapple on the yield and yield components of both crops and to determine economically optimum coffee to pineapple strip intercropping ratio for the study area. The experiment was laid out in a randomized complete block design with three replications. Coffee variety (Fayate) and Smooth Cayenne Pineapple variety were used. The experiment was comprised five treatments: sole coffee, sole Pineapple, 1C:1, 1:2, and 1:3 ratio of coffee with pineapple. The pooled mean analysis revealed that the sole planted coffee and pineapple were produced statically highest yields in contrast with other intercropped treatments. Regarding strip intercropping treatments, the highest and lowest clean coffee yield were recorded at 1C:1P (1289 kg ha-1) and 1C:2P (1128 kg ha-1) treatments. The highest total land equivalent ratio was recorded at 1C:3P (1.50), closely followed by 4C:1P (1.36), 1C:1P (1.32), and 1C:2P (1.23) or a relative yield advantage of 23 to 50% was obtained from the coffee-Pineapple strip intercropping treatments. Therefore, this finding recommend that strip intercropping of coffee with pineapple at 1C:3P ratio is a viable option for sustainable productivity in yield and yield profit to farmers as revealed by the highest total LER.},
 year = {2021}
}

Copy | Download

TY  - JOUR
T1  - Yield and Yield Advantage of the Component Crops as Affected by Strip Intercropping of Coffee (Coffea arabica L.) with Pineapple (Ananas comosus L.)
AU  - Leta Ajema
AU  - Ashenafi Nigussie
Y1  - 2021/07/07
PY  - 2021
N1  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajbio.20210904.11
DO  - 10.11648/j.ajbio.20210904.11
T2  - American Journal of BioScience
JF  - American Journal of BioScience
JO  - American Journal of BioScience
SP  - 116
EP  - 121
PB  - Science Publishing Group
SN  - 2330-0167
UR  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajbio.20210904.11
AB  - Intercropping has a number of advantages over mono-cropping production system, which has significant problems and that there are sufficient justification for studying intercropping approaches. Consequently, researchers have proposed a systematic intercropping approach to evaluate the benefits of strip intercropping in terms of yield advantage, economic return, yield stability, pest control, nutrient use efficiency, etc. However, because of these advantages, intercropping is practiced in many parts of the world, especially in developing countries like Ethiopia. A field experiment was conducted at Awada Agriculture Research Sub-center during 2012 and 2019 to evaluate the effect of strip intercropping ratios of coffee with pineapple on the yield and yield components of both crops and to determine economically optimum coffee to pineapple strip intercropping ratio for the study area. The experiment was laid out in a randomized complete block design with three replications. Coffee variety (Fayate) and Smooth Cayenne Pineapple variety were used. The experiment was comprised five treatments: sole coffee, sole Pineapple, 1C:1, 1:2, and 1:3 ratio of coffee with pineapple. The pooled mean analysis revealed that the sole planted coffee and pineapple were produced statically highest yields in contrast with other intercropped treatments. Regarding strip intercropping treatments, the highest and lowest clean coffee yield were recorded at 1C:1P (1289 kg ha-1) and 1C:2P (1128 kg ha-1) treatments. The highest total land equivalent ratio was recorded at 1C:3P (1.50), closely followed by 4C:1P (1.36), 1C:1P (1.32), and 1C:2P (1.23) or a relative yield advantage of 23 to 50% was obtained from the coffee-Pineapple strip intercropping treatments. Therefore, this finding recommend that strip intercropping of coffee with pineapple at 1C:3P ratio is a viable option for sustainable productivity in yield and yield profit to farmers as revealed by the highest total LER.
VL  - 9
IS  - 4
ER  -

Copy | Download