In many developing African cities, municipalities' incapability to handle the growing amount of waste produced is becoming a worrisome concern. When solid waste management practices are outlined in terms of their sources, generation rate, transport capacity, transfer, and physical composition, they may be effective. The lack of timely information about waste generation, composition, environmental effectiveness, and community involvement in the solid waste management system in Freetown has been identified as a serious impediment to the long-term management of municipal solid waste practices. An evaluation of the difficulties of municipal solid waste management in the Freetown Western Area was conducted in this study by looking at environmental effectiveness and community participation. The Freetown Solid Waste Management (FSWM) was evaluated using a conceptual model of environmental effectiveness proposed by Kütting to see how ecologically efficient it is at ameliorating the horrible environmental impacts of solid waste. The study discovered that the current solid waste management system does not enhance environmental effectiveness and has a negative impact on the community. Inability to sufficiently separate waste at the source, and reduces the amount for final disposal implies a lack of community participation, environmental effectiveness, and institutional control of municipal solid waste handling. This analysis revealed that Freetown practices the least favoured option in the waste management hierarchy. That is, the first and best practice is to dispose of waste in waste dumps. The authors strongly recommend that the approach to these determinants focus on how solid waste is treated, rather than how waste is simply removed for final disposal.
| Published in | American Journal of Environmental Protection (Volume 11, Issue 4) |
| DOI | 10.11648/j.ajep.20221104.11 |
| Page(s) | 82-96 |
| Creative Commons |
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited. |
| Copyright |
Copyright © The Author(s), 2022. Published by Science Publishing Group |
Environmental Effectiveness, Municipal Solid Waste, Determinants, Community Participation, Freetown
| [1] | World Bank, What a Waste 2.0, A Global Snapshot of Solid Waste Management to 2050, Trends in Solid Waste Management. 2020. |
| [2] | D. Hoornweg and P. Bhada-Tata, “What a waste: a global review of solid waste management,” 2012. |
| [3] | T. Prechthai, C. Visvanathan, and C. Cheimchaisri, “RDF production potential of municipal solid waste,” in The 2 nd Joint International Conference on “Sustainable Energy and Environment (SEE 2006), 2006, pp. 21–23. |
| [4] | P. Bhada-Tata and D. A. Hoornweg, “What a waste?: a global review of solid waste management,” The World Bank, 2012. |
| [5] | J. Petts, “Effective waste management: Understanding and dealing with public concerns,” Waste Manag. Res., vol. 12, no. 3, pp. 207–222, 1994. |
| [6] | R. Couth and C. Trois, “Cost-effective waste management through composting in Africa,” Waste Manag., vol. 32, no. 12, pp. 2518–2525, 2012. |
| [7] | K. Miezah, K. Obiri-Danso, Z. Kádár, B. Fei-Baffoe, and M. Y. Mensah, “Municipal solid waste characterization and quantification as a measure towards effective waste management in Ghana,” Waste Manag., vol. 46, pp. 15–27, 2015. |
| [8] | Hoornweg, Daniel, and Perinaz Bhada-Tata. "What a waste: a global review of solid waste management." (2012). |
| [9] | T. Ogwueleka, “Municipal solid waste characteristics and management in Nigeria,” 2009. |
| [10] | T. Melaku, “HOUSEHOLD SOLID WASTE GENERATION RATE AND PHYSICAL COMPOSITION ANALYSIS, IN JIMMA TOWN ETHIOPIA,” PhD Thesis, Addis Ababa University, 2008. |
| [11] | H. Ashenafi, “Determinants of Effective Household Solid Waste Management Practices: the Case of Ambo Town–West Showa Zone,” PhD Thesis, 2011. |
| [12] | A. Haile, “Determinants of effective household solid waste management practices: The Case of Ambo Town–West Showa Zone,” in Conference of Jimma University, 2012, p. 321. |
| [13] | A. B. Gogra et al., “A situational analysis of waste management in Freetown, Sierra Leone,” J. Am. Sci., vol. 6, no. 5, pp. 124–135, 2010. |
| [14] | F. P. Sankoh, X. Yan, and A. M. H. Conteh, “A situational assessment of socioeconomic factors affecting the solid waste generation and composition in Freetown, Sierra Leone,” J. Environ. Prot., vol. 2012, 2012. |
| [15] | A. O. Ngegba and A. J. Bertin, “Assessment of the Energy Potential of Municipal Solid Waste (MSW) in Freetown, Sierra Leone,” Open Access Libr. J., vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 1–15, 2020. |
| [16] | J. Ahmad et al., “World development report 2004: Making services work for poor people,” The World Bank, 2003. |
| [17] | Stat-SL, “Sierra Leone 2015 Population and Housing Census,” 2015. |
| [18] | G. Kütting, Environment, society, and international relations: towards more effective international environmental agreements. Psychology Press, 2000. |
| [19] | G. Kütting, Conventions, Treaties And Other Responses To Global Issues. EOLSS, in partnership with UNESCO, 2009. |
| [20] | G. Kutting, “Distinguishing between institutional and environmental effectiveness in international environmental agreements: the case of the Mediterranean Action Plan,” Int. J. Peace Stud., vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 15–34, 2000. |
| [21] | A. R. Davies, The geographies of garbage governance: interventions, interactions, and outcomes. Ashgate Publishing, Ltd., 2008. |
| [22] | H. Corvellec and J. Hultman, “Waste management companies: Critical urban infrastructural services that design the sociomateriality of waste,” Organising Waste City, pp. 139–155, 2013. |
| [23] | M. Marcussen and J. Torfing, Democratic network governance in Europe. Springer, 2006. |
| [24] | B. Hollstein, W. Matiaske, and K.-U. Schnapp, “Networked governance: Taking networks seriously,” in Networked Governance, Springer, 2017, pp. 1–11. |
| [25] | G. H. Fagan, “Sociological reflections on governing waste,” Ir. J. Sociol., vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 67–84, 2003. |
| [26] | A. Belgium, “Final report: analysis of the evolution of waste reduction and the scope of waste prevention,” Eur. Comm. DG Environ. Arcadis Antwerp., 2010. |
| [27] | K. Bell and D. Sweeting, “Waste collection as an environmental justice issue: A case study of a neighbourhood in Bristol, UK,” Organising Waste City, pp. 201–222, 2013. |
| [28] | G. Kütting, “New dimensions of effectiveness in the analysis of international environmental agreements,” in Global Environmental Policies, Springer, 2001, pp. 66–98. |
| [29] | FAO, FAOLEX, and ECOLEX, “Solid Waste Management Proclamation (No. 513 of 2007). | InforMEA,” 2007. https://www.informea.org/en/legislation/solid-waste-management-proclamation-no-513-2007 (accessed Jul. 18, 2021). |
| [30] | G. H. Fagan, “Waste management and its contestation in the Republic of Ireland,” Capital. Nat. Social., vol. 15, no. 1, pp. 83–102, 2004. |
| [31] | B. Reed and R. Mena-Moreno, “WASH in Emergencies | Problem Exploration Report | Solid Waste Management,” Solid Waste Manag., p. 38, 2016. |
| [32] | H. Acharya, Municipal solid waste management; problem and opportunity. 2018. |
| [33] | T. V. Ramachandra, H. A. Bharath, G. Kulkarni, and S. S. Han, “Municipal solid waste: Generation, composition and GHG emissions in Bangalore, India,” Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev., vol. 82, pp. 1122–1136, 2018. |
| [34] | G. Tchobanoglous and F. Kreith, Handbook of solid waste management. McGraw-Hill Education, 2002. |
| [35] | R. Chandrappa and D. B. Das, “Waste quantities and characteristics,” in Solid waste management, Springer, 2012, pp. 47–63. |
| [36] | B. Wisner, J. Adams, and J. Adams, Environmental health in emergencies and disasters: a practical guide. World health organization, 2002. |
| [37] | S. Kaza, L. Yao, P. Bhada-Tata, and F. Van Woerden, What a waste 2.0: a global snapshot of solid waste management to 2050. The World Bank, 2018. |
| [38] | S. Kaza, L. C. Yao, P. Bhada-Tata, and F. Van Woerden, “What a Waste 2.0: A Global Snapshot of Solid Waste Management to 2050. World Bank Group; 2018,” Diffic. Implement. CO2 CO CH4 CH2O2, 2020. |
| [39] | E. Achankeng, “Globalization, urbanization and municipal solid waste management in Africa,” in Proceedings of the African Studies Association of Australasia and the Pacific 26th annual conference, 2003, pp. 1–22. |
| [40] | M. N. Araya, “A review of effective waste management from an EU, national, and local perspective and its influence: The management of biowaste and anaerobic digestion of municipal solid waste,” J. Environ. Prot., vol. 9, no. 6, pp. 652–670, 2018. |
| [41] | E. Kavals, K. Klavenieks, J. Gusca, and D. Blumberga, “Indicator analysis of integrated municipal waste management system. Case study of Latvia,” Energy Procedia, vol. 147, pp. 227–234, 2018. |
| [42] | N. Gregson and M. Crang, “From waste to resource: The trade-in wastes and global recycling economies,” Annu. Rev. Environ. Resour., vol. 40, pp. 151–176, 2015. |
| [43] | C. I. Chalokwu, “Petrology of the Freetown Layered Complex, Sierra Leone: part II. Magma evolution and crystallisation conditions,” J. Afr. Earth Sci., vol. 32, no. 3, pp. 519–540, 2001. |
| [44] | S. Callegaro et al., “Geochemical constraints provided by the Freetown Layered Complex (Sierra Leone) on the origin of high-Ti tholeiitic CAMP magmas,” J. Petrol., vol. 58, no. 9, pp. 1811–1840, 2017. |
| [45] | G. D. Israel, “Determining sample size,” 1992. |
| [46] | E. Stephanie, Slovin’s Formula Sampling Techniques. Houghton-Mifflin, New York, USA, 2003. |
| [47] | W. G. Cochran, Sampling techniques. John Wiley & Sons, 2007. |
| [48] | D. A. Dillman, Mail and Internet surveys: The tailored design method–2007 Update with new Internet, visual, and mixed-mode guide. John Wiley & Sons, 2011. |
| [49] | X. Wang et al., “Assessing willingness to accept compensation for polluted farmlands: a contingent valuation method case study in northwest China,” Environ. Earth Sci., vol. 75, no. 3, p. 179, 2016. |
| [50] | S.-H. Yoo and S.-Y. Kwak, “Willingness to pay for green electricity in Korea: A contingent valuation study,” Energy Policy, vol. 37, no. 12, pp. 5408–5416, 2009. |
APA Style
Tamba Komba. (2022). Environmental Effectiveness and Community Participation in Sustainable Solid Waste Management Practices in Freetown City, Sierra Leone. American Journal of Environmental Protection, 11(4), 82-96. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajep.20221104.11
ACS Style
Tamba Komba. Environmental Effectiveness and Community Participation in Sustainable Solid Waste Management Practices in Freetown City, Sierra Leone. Am. J. Environ. Prot. 2022, 11(4), 82-96. doi: 10.11648/j.ajep.20221104.11
Share This Article
Twitter
Linked In
Facebook
Copy
Download@article{10.11648/j.ajep.20221104.11,
author = {Tamba Komba},
title = {Environmental Effectiveness and Community Participation in Sustainable Solid Waste Management Practices in Freetown City, Sierra Leone},
journal = {American Journal of Environmental Protection},
volume = {11},
number = {4},
pages = {82-96},
doi = {10.11648/j.ajep.20221104.11},
url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajep.20221104.11},
eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.ajep.20221104.11},
abstract = {In many developing African cities, municipalities' incapability to handle the growing amount of waste produced is becoming a worrisome concern. When solid waste management practices are outlined in terms of their sources, generation rate, transport capacity, transfer, and physical composition, they may be effective. The lack of timely information about waste generation, composition, environmental effectiveness, and community involvement in the solid waste management system in Freetown has been identified as a serious impediment to the long-term management of municipal solid waste practices. An evaluation of the difficulties of municipal solid waste management in the Freetown Western Area was conducted in this study by looking at environmental effectiveness and community participation. The Freetown Solid Waste Management (FSWM) was evaluated using a conceptual model of environmental effectiveness proposed by Kütting to see how ecologically efficient it is at ameliorating the horrible environmental impacts of solid waste. The study discovered that the current solid waste management system does not enhance environmental effectiveness and has a negative impact on the community. Inability to sufficiently separate waste at the source, and reduces the amount for final disposal implies a lack of community participation, environmental effectiveness, and institutional control of municipal solid waste handling. This analysis revealed that Freetown practices the least favoured option in the waste management hierarchy. That is, the first and best practice is to dispose of waste in waste dumps. The authors strongly recommend that the approach to these determinants focus on how solid waste is treated, rather than how waste is simply removed for final disposal.},
year = {2022}
}
TY - JOUR T1 - Environmental Effectiveness and Community Participation in Sustainable Solid Waste Management Practices in Freetown City, Sierra Leone AU - Tamba Komba Y1 - 2022/07/05 PY - 2022 N1 - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajep.20221104.11 DO - 10.11648/j.ajep.20221104.11 T2 - American Journal of Environmental Protection JF - American Journal of Environmental Protection JO - American Journal of Environmental Protection SP - 82 EP - 96 PB - Science Publishing Group SN - 2328-5699 UR - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajep.20221104.11 AB - In many developing African cities, municipalities' incapability to handle the growing amount of waste produced is becoming a worrisome concern. When solid waste management practices are outlined in terms of their sources, generation rate, transport capacity, transfer, and physical composition, they may be effective. The lack of timely information about waste generation, composition, environmental effectiveness, and community involvement in the solid waste management system in Freetown has been identified as a serious impediment to the long-term management of municipal solid waste practices. An evaluation of the difficulties of municipal solid waste management in the Freetown Western Area was conducted in this study by looking at environmental effectiveness and community participation. The Freetown Solid Waste Management (FSWM) was evaluated using a conceptual model of environmental effectiveness proposed by Kütting to see how ecologically efficient it is at ameliorating the horrible environmental impacts of solid waste. The study discovered that the current solid waste management system does not enhance environmental effectiveness and has a negative impact on the community. Inability to sufficiently separate waste at the source, and reduces the amount for final disposal implies a lack of community participation, environmental effectiveness, and institutional control of municipal solid waste handling. This analysis revealed that Freetown practices the least favoured option in the waste management hierarchy. That is, the first and best practice is to dispose of waste in waste dumps. The authors strongly recommend that the approach to these determinants focus on how solid waste is treated, rather than how waste is simply removed for final disposal. VL - 11 IS - 4 ER -
Email: