Partners in Policymaking® is a leadership and advocacy training program for adults with disabilities and family members of persons with disabilities. The Tennessee Council on Developmental Disabilities began implementing this intensive seven-weekend program in 1993. Objectives: The lasting influence of such a training program on the advocacy practices and leadership activities of graduates once they have completed the program has not been examined; this was the aim of the study. Methods: A follow-up survey seeking to quantify graduates’ current levels of advocacy, community involvement, accomplishments, and overall satisfaction with the training experience was created and sent to 361 graduates across a variety of formats; one hundred and thirty-five individuals completed the measure. Results: The findings suggest that program completion had a lasting impact on participants’ disability-related knowledge, advocacy, and self-assessed ability to create change in disability-related policy. Specifically, a majority of the graduates affirmed increases in leadership skills, leadership ability, and sense of empowerment. In addition, graduates reported increased feelings of connectedness to others with similar life experiences, with a majority even reporting increased quality of life due to participation. Conclusions: Use of a structured training program in leadership and advocacy to increase perceived self-efficacy in disability policy advocacy and leadership is supported. Graduates’ qualitative comments reveal enduring community activism and engagement in systems change, including statewide and national disability-related policy advocacy, years after completing the program.
Published in | American Journal of Health Research (Volume 9, Issue 3) |
DOI | 10.11648/j.ajhr.20210903.12 |
Page(s) | 72-81 |
Creative Commons |
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited. |
Copyright |
Copyright © The Author(s), 2021. Published by Science Publishing Group |
Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities, Leadership Development, Advocacy, Community Inclusion, Partners in Policymaking
[1] | Developmental Disabilities Assistance and Bill of Rights of 2000, Pub. L. No. 106-402 106–402, §1 (a), 114 Stat. 1677 (2000). https://acl.gov/sites/default/files/about-acl/2016-12/dd_act_2000.pdf. |
[2] | The Minnesota Governor's Council on Developmental Disabilities. (2016). Partners in Policymaking Coordinator's Handbook. Minnesota Department on Administration. http://mn.gov/mnddc/pipm/pdf/Partners_Coord_Handbook2016.pdf. |
[3] | Wang, M., Mannan, H., Poston, D., Turnbull, A. P., & Summers, J. A. (2004). Parents’ perceptions of advocacy activities and their impact on family quality of life. Research & Practice for Persons with Severe Disabilities, 29 (2), 144-155. |
[4] | The Minnesota Governor's Council on Developmental Disabilities. (2015). Partners in Policymaking. Minnesota Department on Administration. http://mn.gov/mnddc/pipm/pdf/PiP-Changing-Lives-Changing-Policies1.pdf. |
[5] | Zirpoli, T. J., Hancox, D. H., Wieck, C., & Skarnulis, E. R. (1989). Partners in Policymaking: Empowering people. Journal of the Association for Persons with Severe Handicaps, 14 (2), 163–167. |
[6] | Zirpoli, T. J., Wieck, C., Hancox, D. H., & Skarnulis, E. R. (1994). Partners in Policymaking: The first five years. Mental Retardation, 32 (6), 422–425. |
[7] | Cunconan-Lahr, R., Brotherson, M. J. (1996). Advocacy in disability policy: Parents and consumers as advocates. Mental Retardation, 34 (6), 352–358. |
[8] | Balcazar, F. E., Keys, C. B., Bertram, J. F., & Rizzo, T. (1996). Advocate development in the field of developmental disabilities: A data-based conceptual model. Mental Retardation, 34 (6), 341–351. |
[9] | Reynolds, M. C. (2011). Understanding the partners in policymaking program and the impact of participation on parents of children with developmental disabilities in Missouri [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. University of Missouri-Kansas City. |
[10] | United States Census Bureau. (2017). Quick Facts for Tennessee in 2017. https://www.census.gov/quickfacts/tn. |
[11] | Jackson, S. L. (2015). Research methods and statistics: A critical thinking approach (5th ed.). Wadsworth Publishing. |
[12] | Shenton, A. K. (2004). Strategies for ensuring trustworthiness in qualitative research projects. Education for Information, 22, 63–75. |
[13] | Solomon, N. A. (2018b, July). Two Chattanooga programs promote the safety of individuals with disabilities. Breaking Ground. https://www.tn.gov/cdd/projects-and-initiatives/public-awareness/breaking-ground/breaking-ground-93/breaking-ground-93---two-chattanooga-programs-promote-the-safety-of-individuals-with-disabilities.html. |
[14] | Rice, C. (2017, April). The rest of Menchie’s story. Breaking Ground. https://www.tn.gov/content/dam/tn/cdd/documents/cddbreakingground/Breaking%20Ground%2084%20-%20final%20version.pdf. |
[15] | Solomon, N. A. (2018a, October). Oris G. Bowen breaks employment ground through the state’s Go-DBE program. Breaking Ground. https://www.tn.gov/cdd/projects-and-initiatives/public-awareness/breaking-ground/breaking-ground-94/breaking-ground-94---oris-g--bowen-breaks-employment-ground.html. |
[16] | Earheart, C. (2016, April). Let me “get out to the ballgame!” Breaking Ground. https://www.tn.gov/content/dam/tn/cdd/documents/cddbreakingground/Breaking%20Ground%2082%20-%20April%202016.pdf. |
[17] | Meredith, A. (2016, October). The TIME Act aims to undo subminimum wages. Breaking Ground. https://www.tn.gov/content/dam/tn/cdd/documents/cddbreakingground/Breaking%20Ground%2084%20-%20final%20version.pdf. |
[18] | Shouse, J. (2017, July). Council on Autism Spectrum Disorder is a first step in the right direction. Breaking Ground. https://www.tn.gov/content/dam/tn/cdd/documents/cddbreakingground/Breaking%20Ground%2088%20July%202017%20PDF.pdf. |
[19] | Nulty, D. D. (2008). The adequacy of response rates to online and paper surveys: What can be done? Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 33 (3), 301–314. |
APA Style
Bruce Lane Keisling, Robert Zach DeBerry, Alexandra Marie Vohs. (2021). Twenty-Five Years of the Partners in Policymaking® Leadership Institute: A Longitudinal Survey of Tennessee Alumni. American Journal of Health Research, 9(3), 72-81. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajhr.20210903.12
ACS Style
Bruce Lane Keisling; Robert Zach DeBerry; Alexandra Marie Vohs. Twenty-Five Years of the Partners in Policymaking® Leadership Institute: A Longitudinal Survey of Tennessee Alumni. Am. J. Health Res. 2021, 9(3), 72-81. doi: 10.11648/j.ajhr.20210903.12
AMA Style
Bruce Lane Keisling, Robert Zach DeBerry, Alexandra Marie Vohs. Twenty-Five Years of the Partners in Policymaking® Leadership Institute: A Longitudinal Survey of Tennessee Alumni. Am J Health Res. 2021;9(3):72-81. doi: 10.11648/j.ajhr.20210903.12
@article{10.11648/j.ajhr.20210903.12, author = {Bruce Lane Keisling and Robert Zach DeBerry and Alexandra Marie Vohs}, title = {Twenty-Five Years of the Partners in Policymaking® Leadership Institute: A Longitudinal Survey of Tennessee Alumni}, journal = {American Journal of Health Research}, volume = {9}, number = {3}, pages = {72-81}, doi = {10.11648/j.ajhr.20210903.12}, url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajhr.20210903.12}, eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.ajhr.20210903.12}, abstract = {Partners in Policymaking® is a leadership and advocacy training program for adults with disabilities and family members of persons with disabilities. The Tennessee Council on Developmental Disabilities began implementing this intensive seven-weekend program in 1993. Objectives: The lasting influence of such a training program on the advocacy practices and leadership activities of graduates once they have completed the program has not been examined; this was the aim of the study. Methods: A follow-up survey seeking to quantify graduates’ current levels of advocacy, community involvement, accomplishments, and overall satisfaction with the training experience was created and sent to 361 graduates across a variety of formats; one hundred and thirty-five individuals completed the measure. Results: The findings suggest that program completion had a lasting impact on participants’ disability-related knowledge, advocacy, and self-assessed ability to create change in disability-related policy. Specifically, a majority of the graduates affirmed increases in leadership skills, leadership ability, and sense of empowerment. In addition, graduates reported increased feelings of connectedness to others with similar life experiences, with a majority even reporting increased quality of life due to participation. Conclusions: Use of a structured training program in leadership and advocacy to increase perceived self-efficacy in disability policy advocacy and leadership is supported. Graduates’ qualitative comments reveal enduring community activism and engagement in systems change, including statewide and national disability-related policy advocacy, years after completing the program.}, year = {2021} }
TY - JOUR T1 - Twenty-Five Years of the Partners in Policymaking® Leadership Institute: A Longitudinal Survey of Tennessee Alumni AU - Bruce Lane Keisling AU - Robert Zach DeBerry AU - Alexandra Marie Vohs Y1 - 2021/05/14 PY - 2021 N1 - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajhr.20210903.12 DO - 10.11648/j.ajhr.20210903.12 T2 - American Journal of Health Research JF - American Journal of Health Research JO - American Journal of Health Research SP - 72 EP - 81 PB - Science Publishing Group SN - 2330-8796 UR - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajhr.20210903.12 AB - Partners in Policymaking® is a leadership and advocacy training program for adults with disabilities and family members of persons with disabilities. The Tennessee Council on Developmental Disabilities began implementing this intensive seven-weekend program in 1993. Objectives: The lasting influence of such a training program on the advocacy practices and leadership activities of graduates once they have completed the program has not been examined; this was the aim of the study. Methods: A follow-up survey seeking to quantify graduates’ current levels of advocacy, community involvement, accomplishments, and overall satisfaction with the training experience was created and sent to 361 graduates across a variety of formats; one hundred and thirty-five individuals completed the measure. Results: The findings suggest that program completion had a lasting impact on participants’ disability-related knowledge, advocacy, and self-assessed ability to create change in disability-related policy. Specifically, a majority of the graduates affirmed increases in leadership skills, leadership ability, and sense of empowerment. In addition, graduates reported increased feelings of connectedness to others with similar life experiences, with a majority even reporting increased quality of life due to participation. Conclusions: Use of a structured training program in leadership and advocacy to increase perceived self-efficacy in disability policy advocacy and leadership is supported. Graduates’ qualitative comments reveal enduring community activism and engagement in systems change, including statewide and national disability-related policy advocacy, years after completing the program. VL - 9 IS - 3 ER -