Genotype by Environment Interaction and Stability Analysis in Ethiopian Mustard (Brassica Carinata A Braun) Using AMMI Biplot and Stability Parameters

Mohammed Abu; Berhanu Mengistu; Tilahun Molla

doi:doi:10.11648/j.ajls.20221003.12

| Peer-Reviewed

Genotype by Environment Interaction and Stability Analysis in Ethiopian Mustard (Brassica Carinata A Braun) Using AMMI Biplot and Stability Parameters

Mohammed Abu, Berhanu Mengistu, Tilahun Molla

Published in American Journal of Life Sciences (Volume 10, Issue 3)

Received: 17 May 2022 Accepted: 13 June 2022 Published: 27 June 2022

Views: Downloads:

Download PDF

Share This Article

Twitter
Linked In
Facebook

Abstract

The objective of this study was to evaluate genotype by environment interaction and yield stability in multi environmental locations in Ethiopia. Ten Ethiopian mustard genotypes along with one local check and one standard check were evaluated for seed yield at four locations namely, Holeta, Debrezeit, Asasa and Arsi Negelle during the growing season of 2020/2021. The experimental design was randomized complete block design with four replication. Analysis of variance, Ammi biplot and stability parameters were applied for evaluation of genotype by environment interaction and stability. The analysis of variance showed significant differences (P<0.05) among genotypes, locations and GXE interaction for yield. One of the most widely used models to analyses genotype-by-environment data is the additive main effects and multiplicative interaction (AMMI) model. The AMMI1 biplot showed that genotypes G7, G5, and G8 are less affected by the interaction of genotypes and environmental changes and genotypes G1, G7, G8 and G11 are stable genotypes across locations. The AMMI2 biplot indicates that environments E4 and E3 do not exerted strong interaction forces, while strong interactions forces was observed for E1 and E2. AMMI2 also revealed that genotypes G6, G10, G7, G2, G1 and G5 are less affected by the environmental change whereas the remains are more responsive to environmental change.

Published in	American Journal of Life Sciences (Volume 10, Issue 3)
DOI	10.11648/j.ajls.20221003.12
Page(s)	39-44
Creative Commons	This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited.
Copyright	Copyright © The Author(s), 2022. Published by Science Publishing Group

Keywords

AMMI Biplot, Gollob’s Test, Genotypes, Stability Parameters, Ethiopian Mustard

References

[1]	Getinet A. and Nigussie A. 1997. Highland oil crops. A three decade research experience in Ethiopia. Research report No. 30. Pp. 22-27.
[2]	Pacheco, A., Vargas, M., Alvarado, G., Rodríguez, F., Crossa, J., & Burgueño, J. (2015). GEA-R (Genotype x environment analysis with R for windows) version 4.0. http://hdl.handle.net/11529/10203 [Google Scholar].
[3]	Yan, W. 2002. Singular-value partitioning in biplot analysis of multi-environment trial data. Agronomy Journal, 94: 990-996.
[4]	Miah, A., R. Golam, A. K. Mian, and M. Rohman 2015. Evaluation of canola lines for seed yield stability. International Journal of Agronomy and Agricultural Research 7 (6): 12-19.
[5]	Gutierrez L. Importance in genetic improvement and in the evaluation and choice of cultivars [Internet]. 2010 [Cited 01/14/2020]. Available from: https://eva.udelar.edu.uy/mod/RESArce/view.php?id=91752
[6]	Elias, A. A., Robbins, K. R., Doerge, R. W., & Tuinstra, M. R. (2016). Half a century of studying genotype x environment interactions in plant breeding experiments. Crop Science, 56 (5), 2090–2105. https://doi.org/10.2135/cropsci2015.01.0061 [Crossref], [Web of Science ®], [Google Scholar].
[7]	Rodriguez Gonzalez., R., Ponce-Medina, J., Rueda-Puente, E., Avendano-Reyes, L., Hernández, P., Santillano-Cazares, J., & Cruz-Villegas, M. (2011). Genotype-environment interaction for wheat performance stability in the Mexicali region, B.C., Mexico. Tropical and subtropical agroecosytems, 14 (2), 543–558. [Google Scholar].
[8]	Yang, R. C., J. Crossa, P. L. Cornelius, and J. Burgueno (2009). Biplot analysis of genotype× environment interaction: Proceed with caution. Crop Sci. 49 (5) 1564-1576.
[9]	Zhang, Z., Lu C. and Xiang, Z. H. 1998. Analysis of variety stability based on AMMI model. Acta Agronomica Sinica 24: 304-309.
[10]	Gauch, H. G. and R. W. Zobel. 1997. Identifying Mega-Environments and Targeting Genotypes. Crop Science, 37: 311-326.
[11]	Gollob, H. F. (1968). A statistical model which combines features of factor analytic and analysis of variance techniques. Psychometrika 33 (1) 73-115.
[12]	Gauch, H. G. (2013). A simple protocol for AMMI analysis of yield trials. Crop Sci. 53 (5) 1860-1869.
[13]	Shulka GK. 1972. Some statistical aspects of partitioning genotype environment components of variability. Heredity, 29: 237-245.
[14]	Perkins, J. M., and J. L. Jinks. 1968. Environmental and genotype–environment components of variability: III. Multiple lines and crosses. Heredity 23: 339–356. doi: 10.1038/hdy.1968.48.
[15]	Francis, T. R., and L. W. Kannenberg. 1978. Yield stability studies in short-season maize: A descriptive method for grouping genotypes. Can. J. Plant Sci. 58: 1029–1034. doi: 10.4141/cjps78-157.
[16]	Fekadu Amsalu, "Stability Analysis for Seed Yield and Related Component Traits of Ethiopian Mustard Genotypes (Brasica Carinata A. Braun) in Central Highlands of Ethiopia", International Journal of Research Studies in Science, Engineering and Technology, vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 1-6, 2020.
[17]	Horn, L., Shimelis, H., Sarsu, F., Mwadzingenia, L., Mark Laing, D., 2018. Genotype-byenvironment interaction for grain yield among novel cowpea (Vigna unguiculata L.) Selections derived by gamma irradiation. Crop J. 2018.

Cite This Article

Plain Text BibTeX RIS

APA Style

Mohammed Abu, Berhanu Mengistu, Tilahun Molla. (2022). Genotype by Environment Interaction and Stability Analysis in Ethiopian Mustard (Brassica Carinata A Braun) Using AMMI Biplot and Stability Parameters. American Journal of Life Sciences, 10(3), 39-44. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajls.20221003.12

Copy | Download

ACS Style

Mohammed Abu; Berhanu Mengistu; Tilahun Molla. Genotype by Environment Interaction and Stability Analysis in Ethiopian Mustard (Brassica Carinata A Braun) Using AMMI Biplot and Stability Parameters. Am. J. Life Sci. 2022, 10(3), 39-44. doi: 10.11648/j.ajls.20221003.12

Copy | Download

AMA Style

Mohammed Abu, Berhanu Mengistu, Tilahun Molla. Genotype by Environment Interaction and Stability Analysis in Ethiopian Mustard (Brassica Carinata A Braun) Using AMMI Biplot and Stability Parameters. Am J Life Sci. 2022;10(3):39-44. doi: 10.11648/j.ajls.20221003.12

Copy | Download

@article{10.11648/j.ajls.20221003.12,
  author = {Mohammed Abu and Berhanu Mengistu and Tilahun Molla},
  title = {Genotype by Environment Interaction and Stability Analysis in Ethiopian Mustard (Brassica Carinata A Braun) Using AMMI Biplot and Stability Parameters},
  journal = {American Journal of Life Sciences},
  volume = {10},
  number = {3},
  pages = {39-44},
  doi = {10.11648/j.ajls.20221003.12},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajls.20221003.12},
  eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.ajls.20221003.12},
  abstract = {The objective of this study was to evaluate genotype by environment interaction and yield stability in multi environmental locations in Ethiopia. Ten Ethiopian mustard genotypes along with one local check and one standard check were evaluated for seed yield at four locations namely, Holeta, Debrezeit, Asasa and Arsi Negelle during the growing season of 2020/2021. The experimental design was randomized complete block design with four replication. Analysis of variance, Ammi biplot and stability parameters were applied for evaluation of genotype by environment interaction and stability. The analysis of variance showed significant differences (P<0.05) among genotypes, locations and GXE interaction for yield. One of the most widely used models to analyses genotype-by-environment data is the additive main effects and multiplicative interaction (AMMI) model. The AMMI1 biplot showed that genotypes G7, G5, and G8 are less affected by the interaction of genotypes and environmental changes and genotypes G1, G7, G8 and G11 are stable genotypes across locations. The AMMI2 biplot indicates that environments E4 and E3 do not exerted strong interaction forces, while strong interactions forces was observed for E1 and E2. AMMI2 also revealed that genotypes G6, G10, G7, G2, G1 and G5 are less affected by the environmental change whereas the remains are more responsive to environmental change.},
 year = {2022}
}

Copy | Download

TY  - JOUR
T1  - Genotype by Environment Interaction and Stability Analysis in Ethiopian Mustard (Brassica Carinata A Braun) Using AMMI Biplot and Stability Parameters
AU  - Mohammed Abu
AU  - Berhanu Mengistu
AU  - Tilahun Molla
Y1  - 2022/06/27
PY  - 2022
N1  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajls.20221003.12
DO  - 10.11648/j.ajls.20221003.12
T2  - American Journal of Life Sciences
JF  - American Journal of Life Sciences
JO  - American Journal of Life Sciences
SP  - 39
EP  - 44
PB  - Science Publishing Group
SN  - 2328-5737
UR  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajls.20221003.12
AB  - The objective of this study was to evaluate genotype by environment interaction and yield stability in multi environmental locations in Ethiopia. Ten Ethiopian mustard genotypes along with one local check and one standard check were evaluated for seed yield at four locations namely, Holeta, Debrezeit, Asasa and Arsi Negelle during the growing season of 2020/2021. The experimental design was randomized complete block design with four replication. Analysis of variance, Ammi biplot and stability parameters were applied for evaluation of genotype by environment interaction and stability. The analysis of variance showed significant differences (P<0.05) among genotypes, locations and GXE interaction for yield. One of the most widely used models to analyses genotype-by-environment data is the additive main effects and multiplicative interaction (AMMI) model. The AMMI1 biplot showed that genotypes G7, G5, and G8 are less affected by the interaction of genotypes and environmental changes and genotypes G1, G7, G8 and G11 are stable genotypes across locations. The AMMI2 biplot indicates that environments E4 and E3 do not exerted strong interaction forces, while strong interactions forces was observed for E1 and E2. AMMI2 also revealed that genotypes G6, G10, G7, G2, G1 and G5 are less affected by the environmental change whereas the remains are more responsive to environmental change.
VL  - 10
IS  - 3
ER  -

Copy | Download

Author Information

Mohammed Abu

Ethiopian Institute of Agricultural Research, Holeta Agricultural Research Center, Holeta, Ethiopia
Berhanu Mengistu

Ethiopian Institute of Agricultural Research, Holeta Agricultural Research Center, Holeta, Ethiopia
Tilahun Molla

Ethiopian Institute of Agricultural Research, Holeta Agricultural Research Center, Holeta, Ethiopia

Download PDF

Sections

Plain Text BibTeX RIS

APA Style

Mohammed Abu, Berhanu Mengistu, Tilahun Molla. (2022). Genotype by Environment Interaction and Stability Analysis in Ethiopian Mustard (Brassica Carinata A Braun) Using AMMI Biplot and Stability Parameters. American Journal of Life Sciences, 10(3), 39-44. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajls.20221003.12

Copy | Download

ACS Style

Mohammed Abu; Berhanu Mengistu; Tilahun Molla. Genotype by Environment Interaction and Stability Analysis in Ethiopian Mustard (Brassica Carinata A Braun) Using AMMI Biplot and Stability Parameters. Am. J. Life Sci. 2022, 10(3), 39-44. doi: 10.11648/j.ajls.20221003.12

Copy | Download

AMA Style

Mohammed Abu, Berhanu Mengistu, Tilahun Molla. Genotype by Environment Interaction and Stability Analysis in Ethiopian Mustard (Brassica Carinata A Braun) Using AMMI Biplot and Stability Parameters. Am J Life Sci. 2022;10(3):39-44. doi: 10.11648/j.ajls.20221003.12

Copy | Download

@article{10.11648/j.ajls.20221003.12,
  author = {Mohammed Abu and Berhanu Mengistu and Tilahun Molla},
  title = {Genotype by Environment Interaction and Stability Analysis in Ethiopian Mustard (Brassica Carinata A Braun) Using AMMI Biplot and Stability Parameters},
  journal = {American Journal of Life Sciences},
  volume = {10},
  number = {3},
  pages = {39-44},
  doi = {10.11648/j.ajls.20221003.12},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajls.20221003.12},
  eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.ajls.20221003.12},
  abstract = {The objective of this study was to evaluate genotype by environment interaction and yield stability in multi environmental locations in Ethiopia. Ten Ethiopian mustard genotypes along with one local check and one standard check were evaluated for seed yield at four locations namely, Holeta, Debrezeit, Asasa and Arsi Negelle during the growing season of 2020/2021. The experimental design was randomized complete block design with four replication. Analysis of variance, Ammi biplot and stability parameters were applied for evaluation of genotype by environment interaction and stability. The analysis of variance showed significant differences (P<0.05) among genotypes, locations and GXE interaction for yield. One of the most widely used models to analyses genotype-by-environment data is the additive main effects and multiplicative interaction (AMMI) model. The AMMI1 biplot showed that genotypes G7, G5, and G8 are less affected by the interaction of genotypes and environmental changes and genotypes G1, G7, G8 and G11 are stable genotypes across locations. The AMMI2 biplot indicates that environments E4 and E3 do not exerted strong interaction forces, while strong interactions forces was observed for E1 and E2. AMMI2 also revealed that genotypes G6, G10, G7, G2, G1 and G5 are less affected by the environmental change whereas the remains are more responsive to environmental change.},
 year = {2022}
}

Copy | Download

TY  - JOUR
T1  - Genotype by Environment Interaction and Stability Analysis in Ethiopian Mustard (Brassica Carinata A Braun) Using AMMI Biplot and Stability Parameters
AU  - Mohammed Abu
AU  - Berhanu Mengistu
AU  - Tilahun Molla
Y1  - 2022/06/27
PY  - 2022
N1  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajls.20221003.12
DO  - 10.11648/j.ajls.20221003.12
T2  - American Journal of Life Sciences
JF  - American Journal of Life Sciences
JO  - American Journal of Life Sciences
SP  - 39
EP  - 44
PB  - Science Publishing Group
SN  - 2328-5737
UR  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajls.20221003.12
AB  - The objective of this study was to evaluate genotype by environment interaction and yield stability in multi environmental locations in Ethiopia. Ten Ethiopian mustard genotypes along with one local check and one standard check were evaluated for seed yield at four locations namely, Holeta, Debrezeit, Asasa and Arsi Negelle during the growing season of 2020/2021. The experimental design was randomized complete block design with four replication. Analysis of variance, Ammi biplot and stability parameters were applied for evaluation of genotype by environment interaction and stability. The analysis of variance showed significant differences (P<0.05) among genotypes, locations and GXE interaction for yield. One of the most widely used models to analyses genotype-by-environment data is the additive main effects and multiplicative interaction (AMMI) model. The AMMI1 biplot showed that genotypes G7, G5, and G8 are less affected by the interaction of genotypes and environmental changes and genotypes G1, G7, G8 and G11 are stable genotypes across locations. The AMMI2 biplot indicates that environments E4 and E3 do not exerted strong interaction forces, while strong interactions forces was observed for E1 and E2. AMMI2 also revealed that genotypes G6, G10, G7, G2, G1 and G5 are less affected by the environmental change whereas the remains are more responsive to environmental change.
VL  - 10
IS  - 3
ER  -

Copy | Download