In survey sampling statisticians often make estimation of population parameters. This can be done using a number of the available approaches which include design-based, model-based, model-assisted or randomization-assisted model based approach. In this paper regression estimation under model based approach has been studied. In regression estimation, researchers can opt to use parametric or nonparametric estimation technique. Because of the challenges that one can encounter as a result of model misspecification in the parametric type of regression, the nonparametric regression has become popular especially in the recent past. This paper explores this type of regression estimation. Kernel estimation usually forms an integral part in this type of regression. There are a number of functions available for such a use. The goal of this study is to compare the performance of the different nonparametric regression estimators (the finite population total estimator due Dorfman (1992), the proposed finite population total estimator that incorporates reflection technique in modifying the kernel smoother), the ratio estimator and the design-based Horvitz-Thompson estimator. To achieve this, data was simulated using a number of commonly used models. From this data the assessment of the estimators mentioned above has been done using the conditional biases. Confidence intervals have also been constructed with a view to determining the better estimator of those studied. The findings indicate that proposed estimator of finite population total that is nonparametric and uses data reflection technique is better in the context of the analysis done.
Published in | American Journal of Theoretical and Applied Statistics (Volume 9, Issue 4) |
DOI | 10.11648/j.ajtas.20200904.13 |
Page(s) | 101-105 |
Creative Commons |
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited. |
Copyright |
Copyright © The Author(s), 2020. Published by Science Publishing Group |
Conditional Biases, Reflection Technique, Confidence Lengths, Nonparametric Regression Estimation
[1] | Alberts T and Karunamuni R. J. (2007). Boundary correction methods in Kernel density estimation. Presentation slides downloaded from internet. |
[2] | Albers M. G. (2011). Boundary Estimation of Densities with Bounded Support. Swiss Federal Institute of Technology Zurich. Masters’ Thesis. |
[3] | Breidt, B. F. and Opsomer, J. D. (2000). Local Polynomial regression in Survey Sampling. Annals of Statistics 28 (August): 1026-1053. |
[4] | Breidt, F. J. and Opsomer, J. (2009). Nonparametric and Semiparametric Estimation in Complex Surveys, Handbooks of Statistics, vol. 29B, eds. D. Pfeffermann and C. R. Rao, 103-121. |
[5] | Brewer (2002). Combined survey sampling inference: weighing Basu’s Elephants. London, Arnold a member of the Hodder Headline Group. |
[6] | Čížek, P., & Sadıkoglu, S. (2020). Robust nonparametric regression: A review. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1002/wics.1492. |
[7] | Cochran, W. G. (1977), Sampling Techniques (3rd ed.), New York: John Wiley. |
[8] | Cox B. G. (1995) Business survey methods. New York: John Wiley. |
[9] | Dhekale, B. S., Sahu, P. K., Vishwajith, K. P., Mishra, P., & Narsimhaiah, L. (2017). Application of parametric and nonparametric regression models for area, production and productivity trends of tea (Camellia sinensis) in India. Indian Journal of Ecology, 44 (2), 192-200. |
[10] | Dorfman, A. H.(1992), Nonparametric Regression for Estimating Totals in Finite Populations. In proceedings of the section on Survey Research Methods. Alexandria VA: American Statistics Association. Pp 622-625. |
[11] | Eubank, R. L., 1988. Spline Smoothing and Nonparametric Regression. Marcel Dekker, New York. |
[12] | Eubank, R. L., Speackman, P. L., (1991). A bias reduction theorem with application in nonparametric regression, Scandinavian Journal of Statistics. 18, 211- 222. |
[13] | Gasser, Th., Miiller, H. G., (1979). In: Gasser, Th., Rosenblatt, M. (Eds.) Kernel estimation of regression functions: in Smoothing Techniques for Curve Estimation. Springer, Heidelberg, pp. 23-68. |
[14] | Horvitz, D. G. and Thompson, D. J. (1952). A generalization of sampling without replacement from a finite universe. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 47, 663-685. |
[15] | Kyung-Joon C. and Schucany W. R. (1998), Nonparametric kernel regression estimation near endpoints Journal of Statistical Planning and Inference 66 289-304. |
[16] | Rice, J., 1984. Boundary modification for kernel regression. Communication in Statistics. A 13, 893-900. |
[17] | Silverman, B. W. (1986). Density Estimation for Statistics and Data Analysis, London: Chapman and Hall. |
[18] | Schuster E. F (1985). Incorporating support into nonparametric estimators of densities, Communication in Statistics. A 14, 1123-36. |
[19] | Tibshirani, R., & Wasserman, L. (2015). Nonparametric Regression- Statistical Machine Learning. Retrieved May 22, 2020, from http://www.stat.cmu.edu. |
APA Style
Langat Reuben Cheruiyot. (2020). Exploring Data-Reflection Technique in Nonparametric Regression Estimation of Finite Population Total: An Empirical Study. American Journal of Theoretical and Applied Statistics, 9(4), 101-105. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajtas.20200904.13
ACS Style
Langat Reuben Cheruiyot. Exploring Data-Reflection Technique in Nonparametric Regression Estimation of Finite Population Total: An Empirical Study. Am. J. Theor. Appl. Stat. 2020, 9(4), 101-105. doi: 10.11648/j.ajtas.20200904.13
AMA Style
Langat Reuben Cheruiyot. Exploring Data-Reflection Technique in Nonparametric Regression Estimation of Finite Population Total: An Empirical Study. Am J Theor Appl Stat. 2020;9(4):101-105. doi: 10.11648/j.ajtas.20200904.13
@article{10.11648/j.ajtas.20200904.13, author = {Langat Reuben Cheruiyot}, title = {Exploring Data-Reflection Technique in Nonparametric Regression Estimation of Finite Population Total: An Empirical Study}, journal = {American Journal of Theoretical and Applied Statistics}, volume = {9}, number = {4}, pages = {101-105}, doi = {10.11648/j.ajtas.20200904.13}, url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajtas.20200904.13}, eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.ajtas.20200904.13}, abstract = {In survey sampling statisticians often make estimation of population parameters. This can be done using a number of the available approaches which include design-based, model-based, model-assisted or randomization-assisted model based approach. In this paper regression estimation under model based approach has been studied. In regression estimation, researchers can opt to use parametric or nonparametric estimation technique. Because of the challenges that one can encounter as a result of model misspecification in the parametric type of regression, the nonparametric regression has become popular especially in the recent past. This paper explores this type of regression estimation. Kernel estimation usually forms an integral part in this type of regression. There are a number of functions available for such a use. The goal of this study is to compare the performance of the different nonparametric regression estimators (the finite population total estimator due Dorfman (1992), the proposed finite population total estimator that incorporates reflection technique in modifying the kernel smoother), the ratio estimator and the design-based Horvitz-Thompson estimator. To achieve this, data was simulated using a number of commonly used models. From this data the assessment of the estimators mentioned above has been done using the conditional biases. Confidence intervals have also been constructed with a view to determining the better estimator of those studied. The findings indicate that proposed estimator of finite population total that is nonparametric and uses data reflection technique is better in the context of the analysis done.}, year = {2020} }
TY - JOUR T1 - Exploring Data-Reflection Technique in Nonparametric Regression Estimation of Finite Population Total: An Empirical Study AU - Langat Reuben Cheruiyot Y1 - 2020/06/03 PY - 2020 N1 - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajtas.20200904.13 DO - 10.11648/j.ajtas.20200904.13 T2 - American Journal of Theoretical and Applied Statistics JF - American Journal of Theoretical and Applied Statistics JO - American Journal of Theoretical and Applied Statistics SP - 101 EP - 105 PB - Science Publishing Group SN - 2326-9006 UR - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajtas.20200904.13 AB - In survey sampling statisticians often make estimation of population parameters. This can be done using a number of the available approaches which include design-based, model-based, model-assisted or randomization-assisted model based approach. In this paper regression estimation under model based approach has been studied. In regression estimation, researchers can opt to use parametric or nonparametric estimation technique. Because of the challenges that one can encounter as a result of model misspecification in the parametric type of regression, the nonparametric regression has become popular especially in the recent past. This paper explores this type of regression estimation. Kernel estimation usually forms an integral part in this type of regression. There are a number of functions available for such a use. The goal of this study is to compare the performance of the different nonparametric regression estimators (the finite population total estimator due Dorfman (1992), the proposed finite population total estimator that incorporates reflection technique in modifying the kernel smoother), the ratio estimator and the design-based Horvitz-Thompson estimator. To achieve this, data was simulated using a number of commonly used models. From this data the assessment of the estimators mentioned above has been done using the conditional biases. Confidence intervals have also been constructed with a view to determining the better estimator of those studied. The findings indicate that proposed estimator of finite population total that is nonparametric and uses data reflection technique is better in the context of the analysis done. VL - 9 IS - 4 ER -