This work represents new material can be used in cleaning process of heat exchanger tubes. Rubber projectiles are back bone of on line cleaning mechanism but it has poor mechanical and thermal features. Three materials have different properties with micro scale powder solid phase (aluminum, aluminum oxide and copper) had been added to (LSR) with different volume ratios (2%, 5%, 10%, 15%). specimens had been prepared with certain method and under specific conditions. Compression test was applied to identify stiffness factor of these new composite materials. Wear test was applied to finite the wear rare coefficient for these materials. Un certainty statistics was applied for measurements results so It's founded that with increasing volume ratio each of stiffness factor and wear rate coefficient increase linearity up to (15%) for all specimens. copper filler give best for stiffness that stiffness factor reaches about (30 (N/(mm/mm))) at volume ratio 15%) but poorest wear resistance with wear rate coefficient (9*10-6) Mpa-1 inversely aluminum filler gives best results in wear resistance with wear rate coefficient (6*10-6) Mpa-1 but weakest in stiffness test with stiffness factor (28 N/(mm/mm) at volume ratio 15%). Aluminum oxide was the best choice for new projectile material as it combines between good stiffness and wear resistance.
Published in | Advances in Materials (Volume 12, Issue 2) |
DOI | 10.11648/j.am.20231202.11 |
Page(s) | 17-24 |
Creative Commons |
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited. |
Copyright |
Copyright © The Author(s), 2023. Published by Science Publishing Group |
Stiffness Factor, Wear Rate Coefficient, Silicone Rubber, Projectile Ball
[1] | J. J. Park, J. Y. Lee, and Y. G. Hong, “Effects of vinylsilane-modified nanosilica particles on electrical and mechanical properties of silicone rubber nanocomposites,” Polymer (Guildf), vol. 197, no. April, p. 122493, 2020, doi: 10.1016/j.polymer.2020.122493. |
[2] | N. A. Nordin, F. M. Yussof, S. Kasolang, Z. Salleh, and M. A. Ahmad, “Wear rate of natural fibre: Long kenaf composite,” Procedia Eng., vol. 68, pp. 145–151, 2013, doi: 10.1016/j.proeng.2013.12.160. |
[3] | R. Kohli, Applications of Projectiles for Nonaqueous Cleaning of Interior Surfaces of Tubes, vol. 11. Elsevier Inc., 2019. |
[4] | M. R. Jalalirad, M. S. Abd-Elhady, and M. R. Malayeri, “Cleaning action of spherical projectiles in tubular heat exchangers,” Int. J. Heat Mass Transf., vol. 57, no. 2, pp. 491–499, 2013, doi: 10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2012.10.071. |
[5] | A. Grard, L. Belec, and F. X. Perrin, “Characterization and evaluation of primer formulations for bonding silicone rubber to metal,” Prog. Org. Coatings, vol. 140, no. October 2019, p. 105513, 2020, doi: 10.1016/j.porgcoat.2019.105513. |
[6] | M. S. Abd-Elhady and M. R. Malayeri, “Impact of hardness and surface texture on cleaning action of various projectiles,” Chem. Eng. Res. Des., vol. 94, pp. 153–163, 2015, doi: 10.1016/j.cherd.2014.07.022. |
[7] | M. R. Jalalirad and M. R. Malayeri, “a Criterion for the Selection of Projectiles for Cleaning Tubular Heat Exchangers,” vol. 2013, pp. 332–338, 2013. |
[8] | D. P. Ross, P. A. Cirtog, Z. Cuckovic, G. Bridges, M. Crocker, and C. Dirks, “Energy Savings From an Automatic Tube Cleaning System (Atcs),” Heat Exch. Fouling Clean. – 2017, pp. 221–227, 2017. |
[9] | J. L. Lin, S. M. Su, Y. B. He, and F. Y. Kang, “Improving the thermal and mechanical properties of an alumina-filled silicone rubber composite by incorporating carbon nanotubes,” Xinxing Tan Cailiao/New Carbon Mater., vol. 35, no. 1, pp. 66–72, 2020, doi: 10.1016/S1872-5805(20)60476-0. |
[10] | P. Song, J. Song, and Y. Zhang, “Stretchable conductor based on carbon nanotube/carbon black silicone rubber nanocomposites with highly mechanical, electrical properties and strain sensitivity,” Compos. Part B Eng., vol. 191, no. January, p. 107979, 2020, doi: 10.1016/j.compositesb.2020.107979. |
[11] | I. Madanhire, I. Zimba, and C. Mbohwa, “Improving self-cleaning system for de-fouling thermal power plant heat exchangers: Case study,” Proc. Int. Conf. Ind. Eng. Oper. Manag., vol. 2018, no. JUL, pp. 3042–3054, 2018. |
[12] | T. L. M. Morgado, H. Navas, and R. Brites, “Wear study of Innovative Ti-Ta alloys,” Procedia Struct. Integr., vol. 2, pp. 1266–1276, 2016, doi: 10.1016/j.prostr.2016.06.162. |
[13] | Hanan Al-Ghamd, “Impact of WO3-Nanoparticles on Silicone Rubber for Radiation Protection Efficiency,” Protection Efficiency. Materials 2022, 15, 5706. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma15165706 |
[14] | R. Kleinebrahm, “Mechanical Online System for Cleaning Heat Exchanger Tubes By Sponge Rubber Balls (Taprogge-System),” pp. 240–247, 2017. |
[15] | C. Dearmitt, R. Rothon, and R. Consultants, “Encyclopedia of Polymers and Composites,” Encycl. Polym. Compos., no. 1991, pp. 1–19, 2014, doi: 10.1007/978-3-642-37179-0. |
APA Style
Mohamed Khaled Mohamed Mohamed Hasanin. (2023). Investigation of New Material for Deterging Heat Exchanger Tube. Advances in Materials, 12(2), 17-24. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.am.20231202.11
ACS Style
Mohamed Khaled Mohamed Mohamed Hasanin. Investigation of New Material for Deterging Heat Exchanger Tube. Adv. Mater. 2023, 12(2), 17-24. doi: 10.11648/j.am.20231202.11
AMA Style
Mohamed Khaled Mohamed Mohamed Hasanin. Investigation of New Material for Deterging Heat Exchanger Tube. Adv Mater. 2023;12(2):17-24. doi: 10.11648/j.am.20231202.11
@article{10.11648/j.am.20231202.11, author = {Mohamed Khaled Mohamed Mohamed Hasanin}, title = {Investigation of New Material for Deterging Heat Exchanger Tube}, journal = {Advances in Materials}, volume = {12}, number = {2}, pages = {17-24}, doi = {10.11648/j.am.20231202.11}, url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.am.20231202.11}, eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.am.20231202.11}, abstract = {This work represents new material can be used in cleaning process of heat exchanger tubes. Rubber projectiles are back bone of on line cleaning mechanism but it has poor mechanical and thermal features. Three materials have different properties with micro scale powder solid phase (aluminum, aluminum oxide and copper) had been added to (LSR) with different volume ratios (2%, 5%, 10%, 15%). specimens had been prepared with certain method and under specific conditions. Compression test was applied to identify stiffness factor of these new composite materials. Wear test was applied to finite the wear rare coefficient for these materials. Un certainty statistics was applied for measurements results so It's founded that with increasing volume ratio each of stiffness factor and wear rate coefficient increase linearity up to (15%) for all specimens. copper filler give best for stiffness that stiffness factor reaches about (30 (N/(mm/mm))) at volume ratio 15%) but poorest wear resistance with wear rate coefficient (9*10-6) Mpa-1 inversely aluminum filler gives best results in wear resistance with wear rate coefficient (6*10-6) Mpa-1 but weakest in stiffness test with stiffness factor (28 N/(mm/mm) at volume ratio 15%). Aluminum oxide was the best choice for new projectile material as it combines between good stiffness and wear resistance.}, year = {2023} }
TY - JOUR T1 - Investigation of New Material for Deterging Heat Exchanger Tube AU - Mohamed Khaled Mohamed Mohamed Hasanin Y1 - 2023/05/29 PY - 2023 N1 - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.am.20231202.11 DO - 10.11648/j.am.20231202.11 T2 - Advances in Materials JF - Advances in Materials JO - Advances in Materials SP - 17 EP - 24 PB - Science Publishing Group SN - 2327-252X UR - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.am.20231202.11 AB - This work represents new material can be used in cleaning process of heat exchanger tubes. Rubber projectiles are back bone of on line cleaning mechanism but it has poor mechanical and thermal features. Three materials have different properties with micro scale powder solid phase (aluminum, aluminum oxide and copper) had been added to (LSR) with different volume ratios (2%, 5%, 10%, 15%). specimens had been prepared with certain method and under specific conditions. Compression test was applied to identify stiffness factor of these new composite materials. Wear test was applied to finite the wear rare coefficient for these materials. Un certainty statistics was applied for measurements results so It's founded that with increasing volume ratio each of stiffness factor and wear rate coefficient increase linearity up to (15%) for all specimens. copper filler give best for stiffness that stiffness factor reaches about (30 (N/(mm/mm))) at volume ratio 15%) but poorest wear resistance with wear rate coefficient (9*10-6) Mpa-1 inversely aluminum filler gives best results in wear resistance with wear rate coefficient (6*10-6) Mpa-1 but weakest in stiffness test with stiffness factor (28 N/(mm/mm) at volume ratio 15%). Aluminum oxide was the best choice for new projectile material as it combines between good stiffness and wear resistance. VL - 12 IS - 2 ER -