Tef is the most important cereal crop and the main staple food for more than 70 million people. It is the second-largest crop in terms of the area of production next to maize. But, the average productivity of the crop is very low compared to other cereal crops, and the spatial variability of the productivity of the crop is very high across different districts and peasant associations within the region and across different regions of the country. This variability may arise from different factors like the adoption of high-yielding improved varieties, implemented agronomic practices, soil and environmental conditions, and others. Therefore, this research was intended to assess the impacts of the adoption of improved and high-yielding tef varieties on the improvement of household income in the Dendi district, taking 210 sample households from five peasant associations. Descriptive and econometric data analyses were done. The propensity score matching method and logistic regression model were used for econometric data analysis. Accordingly, the result revealed that household heads who adopted improved and high-yielding tef technologies on average get more income of 7943 birr compared to household heads that are non-adopters of tef technologies. Therefore, improving the awareness of tef farmers towards adoption of high yielding improved tef technologies will contribute to improving the national income generally, and the livelihood of the farm households specifically.
Published in | Economics (Volume 11, Issue 2) |
DOI | 10.11648/j.eco.20221102.11 |
Page(s) | 69-75 |
Creative Commons |
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited. |
Copyright |
Copyright © The Author(s), 2022. Published by Science Publishing Group |
Impact, Adoption of Tef, Income, Dandi District, PSM, Logistic Regression
[1] | CSA, “Area and Production for Major Crops (Private Peasant Holdings, Meher Season) 2020/2021 (2013 E.C.),” CSA, Ethiopia, 590, 2021. [Online]. Available: https://www.statsethiopia.gov.et/wp-content/uploads/2021/05/2013-MEHER-REPORT.FINAL_.pdf |
[2] | A. Cheng, S. Mayes, G. Dalle, S. Demissew, and F. Massawe, “Diversifying crops for food and nutrition security - a case of teff: A case of teff,” Biol. Rev., vol. 92, no. 1, pp. 188–198, Feb. 2017, doi: 10.1111/brv.12225. |
[3] | Solomon Chanyalew et al., “Tef (Eragrostis tef) Variety ‘Dagim,’” vol. 27, no. 2, pp. 131–135, 2017, [Online]. Available: https://www.ajol.info/index.php/ejas/article/view/156186 |
[4] | L. Spaenij-Dekking, Y. Kooy-Winkelaar, and F. Koning, “The Ethiopian Cereal Tef in Celiac Disease,” N. Engl. J. Med., vol. 353, no. 16, pp. 1748–1749, Oct. 2005, doi: 10.1056/NEJMc051492. |
[5] | Seyfu Ketema, Tef. Eragrostis tef (Zucc.) Trotter. Promoting the conservation and use of underutilized and neglected crops. 12. Institute of Plant Genetics and Crop Plant Research, Gatersleben/International Plant Genetic Resources Institute, Rome, Italy. Gatersleben: IPK, 1997. [Online]. Available: https://www.bioversityinternational.org/fileadmin/_migrated/uploads/tx_news/Tef_Eragrostis_tef__Zucc.__Trotter_279.pdf |
[6] | K. Assefa, J.-K. Yu, M. Zeid, G. Belay, H. Tefera, and M. E. Sorrells, “Breeding tef [Eragrostis tef (Zucc.) trotter]: conventional and molecular approaches,” Plant Breed., vol. 130, no. 1, pp. 1–9, Feb. 2011, doi: 10.1111/j.1439-0523.2010.01782.x. |
[7] | K. Baye, “Teff: nutrient composition and health benefits. ESSP Working Paper 67. Washington, D.C. and Addis Ababa, Ethiopia: International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI) and Ethiopian Development Research Institute (EDRI),” p. 20, 2014, [Online]. Available: https://ebrary.ifpri.org/digital/collection/p15738coll2/id/128334 |
[8] | I. Alaunyte, V. Stojceska, A. Plunkett, P. Ainsworth, and E. Derbyshire, “Improving the quality of nutrient-rich Teff (Eragrostis tef) breads by combination of enzymes in straight dough and sourdough breadmaking,” J. Cereal Sci., vol. 55, no. 1, pp. 22–30, Jan. 2012, doi: 10.1016/j.jcs.2011.09.005. |
[9] | A. Tsegay, E. Vanuytrecht, B. Abrha, J. Deckers, K. Gebrehiwot, and D. Raes, “Sowing and irrigation strategies for improving rainfed tef (Eragrostis tef (Zucc.) Trotter) production in the water scarce Tigray region, Ethiopia,” Agric. Water Manag., 2015, doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.agwat.2014.11.014. |
[10] | W. Negash, A. Menzir, and M. Kassaye, “Effect of Row Spacing on Yield and Yield Components of Teff [Eragrostis tef (Zucc.) Trotter] Varieties in Gonji Kolela District, North Western Ethiopia,” J. Biol., p. 9, 2017, [Online]. Available: https://www.iiste.org/Journals/index.php/JBAH/article/view/40186 |
[11] | S. Chanyalew et al., “Significance and prospects of an orphan crop tef,” Planta, vol. 250, no. 3, Sep. 2019, doi: 10.1007/s00425-019-03209-z. |
[12] | K. Assefa et al., “Genetic diversity in tef [Eragrostis tef (Zucc.) Trotter],” Front. Plant Sci., vol. 6, Mar. 2015, doi: 10.3389/fpls.2015.00177. |
[13] | A. Getahun and G. Muleta, “Adoption of Improved Tef Varieties in Central Ethiopia: A Double-Hurdle Model,” Int J Agri Biosci, vol. 10, no. 3, p. 8, 2021, [Online]. Available: http://www.ijagbio.com/pdf-files/volume-10-no-3-2021/140-146.pdf |
[14] | Yamane, Taro, “Statistics, An Introductory Analysis, 2nd Ed., New York: Harper and Row.,” 1967, [Online]. Available: https://www.tarleton.edu/academicassessment/documents/samplesize.pdf |
[15] | T. M. Habtewold, “Adoption and Impact of Improved Agricultural Technologies on Rural Poverty,” in Economic Growth and Development in Ethiopia, A. Heshmati and H. Yoon, Eds. Singapore: Springer Singapore, 2018, pp. 13–38. doi: 10.1007/978-981-10-8126-2_2. |
[16] | Dawit Milkias and Gadisa Muleta, “Economic analysis of factors influencing adoption of barley HB1307 variety In western shewa highlands: the case of Elfeta District,” vol. 10, no. 2, pp. 94–100, 2021, [Online]. Available: http://www.ijagbio.com/pdf-files/volume-10-no-2-2021/87-93.pdf |
[17] | T. Wossen, A. Alene, T. Abdoulaye, S. Feleke, and V. Manyong, “Agricultural technology adoption and household welfare,” Food Policy, vol. 87, p. 101742, Aug. 2019, doi: 10.1016/j.foodpol.2019.101742. |
[18] | A. Shita, N. Kumar, and S. Singh, “The impact of agricultural technology adoption on income inequality: a propensity score matching analysis for rural Ethiopia,” Int. J. Information and Decision Sciences, vol. 12, no. 1, p. 13, 2020, [Online]. Available: https://www.inderscienceonline.com/doi/pdf/10.1504/IJIDS.2020.105013 |
[19] | M. Jaleta, M. Kassie, P. Marenya, C. Yirga, and O. Erenstein, “Impact of improved maize adoption on household food security of maize producing smallholder farmers in Ethiopia,” vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 81–93, 2018, doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12571-017-0759-y. |
[20] | A. Workineh, L. Tayech, and H. K. Ehite, “Agricultural technology adoption and its impact on smallholder farmers welfare in Ethiopia,” Afr. J. Agric. Res., vol. 15, no. 3, pp. 431–445, 2020, doi: 10.5897/AJAR2019.14302. |
[21] | M. B. Zegeye, “Adoption and Ex-post Impact of Agricultural Technologies on Rural Poverty: Evidence from Amhara Region, Ethiopia,” Cogent Econ. Finance, vol. 9, no. 1, p. 1969759, Jan. 2021, doi: 10.1080/23322039.2021.1969759. |
APA Style
Gadisa Muleta, Addisu Getahun. (2022). Impact of Technology Adoption on Household Income: The Case of Tef in Dendi District, Ethiopia. Economics, 11(2), 69-75. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.eco.20221102.11
ACS Style
Gadisa Muleta; Addisu Getahun. Impact of Technology Adoption on Household Income: The Case of Tef in Dendi District, Ethiopia. Economics. 2022, 11(2), 69-75. doi: 10.11648/j.eco.20221102.11
@article{10.11648/j.eco.20221102.11, author = {Gadisa Muleta and Addisu Getahun}, title = {Impact of Technology Adoption on Household Income: The Case of Tef in Dendi District, Ethiopia}, journal = {Economics}, volume = {11}, number = {2}, pages = {69-75}, doi = {10.11648/j.eco.20221102.11}, url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.eco.20221102.11}, eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.eco.20221102.11}, abstract = {Tef is the most important cereal crop and the main staple food for more than 70 million people. It is the second-largest crop in terms of the area of production next to maize. But, the average productivity of the crop is very low compared to other cereal crops, and the spatial variability of the productivity of the crop is very high across different districts and peasant associations within the region and across different regions of the country. This variability may arise from different factors like the adoption of high-yielding improved varieties, implemented agronomic practices, soil and environmental conditions, and others. Therefore, this research was intended to assess the impacts of the adoption of improved and high-yielding tef varieties on the improvement of household income in the Dendi district, taking 210 sample households from five peasant associations. Descriptive and econometric data analyses were done. The propensity score matching method and logistic regression model were used for econometric data analysis. Accordingly, the result revealed that household heads who adopted improved and high-yielding tef technologies on average get more income of 7943 birr compared to household heads that are non-adopters of tef technologies. Therefore, improving the awareness of tef farmers towards adoption of high yielding improved tef technologies will contribute to improving the national income generally, and the livelihood of the farm households specifically.}, year = {2022} }
TY - JOUR T1 - Impact of Technology Adoption on Household Income: The Case of Tef in Dendi District, Ethiopia AU - Gadisa Muleta AU - Addisu Getahun Y1 - 2022/04/14 PY - 2022 N1 - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.eco.20221102.11 DO - 10.11648/j.eco.20221102.11 T2 - Economics JF - Economics JO - Economics SP - 69 EP - 75 PB - Science Publishing Group SN - 2376-6603 UR - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.eco.20221102.11 AB - Tef is the most important cereal crop and the main staple food for more than 70 million people. It is the second-largest crop in terms of the area of production next to maize. But, the average productivity of the crop is very low compared to other cereal crops, and the spatial variability of the productivity of the crop is very high across different districts and peasant associations within the region and across different regions of the country. This variability may arise from different factors like the adoption of high-yielding improved varieties, implemented agronomic practices, soil and environmental conditions, and others. Therefore, this research was intended to assess the impacts of the adoption of improved and high-yielding tef varieties on the improvement of household income in the Dendi district, taking 210 sample households from five peasant associations. Descriptive and econometric data analyses were done. The propensity score matching method and logistic regression model were used for econometric data analysis. Accordingly, the result revealed that household heads who adopted improved and high-yielding tef technologies on average get more income of 7943 birr compared to household heads that are non-adopters of tef technologies. Therefore, improving the awareness of tef farmers towards adoption of high yielding improved tef technologies will contribute to improving the national income generally, and the livelihood of the farm households specifically. VL - 11 IS - 2 ER -