The study evaluated the strategies used to ensure the ecological process in Bwindi Impenetrable National park led to the regeneration of the fauna and flora as well as improved livelihood of the host community. The problem was that the ecological restoration in degraded areas was not efficiently done due to poor strategies used which affected the ecosystem regeneration as well as the local community livelihood. The study was guided by the specific objectives; to evaluate the restoration ecology trends of degraded fauna and flora species in the park; to assess approaches used to restore degraded fauna and flora species restored in the park; to ascertain the benefits of restoration of flora and fauna to both the park and the adjacent local community wellbeing. The study also hypothesized that anthropogenic activities had no drastic effect on ecosystem characteristics in the protected areas. The in depth literature reviewed was about the concepts and detailed information about ecological restoration and community livelihood. The methodology was descriptive and analytical while convenience sampling technique was used. The population of study was 60 whereas a sample had 40 households and 10 UWA staff. The data collection tools used included focus group discussions and interviews. The analysis of data was done by ANOVA to understand the extent of restoration and regeneration processes of ecosystems. The key results indicated that some fauna and flora species in the park were restored. The results revealed that specific restoration strategies used to stimulate regeneration had been applied. Additionally the study found out that the local community also benefited as a result of the ecological restoration process in the park. Conclusively, ecological restoration in Bwindi was practiced and has led to recovery of a number of fauna and flora species. It was recommended that the park should involve the key stakeholders in the ecological restoration process.
| Published in | International Journal of Environmental Protection and Policy (Volume 10, Issue 4) |
| DOI | 10.11648/j.ijepp.20221004.15 |
| Page(s) | 109-117 |
| Creative Commons |
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited. |
| Copyright |
Copyright © The Author(s), 2022. Published by Science Publishing Group |
Ecological, Restoration, Livelihood, Community, Strategy, Ecosystem and Conservation
| [1] | Abelson, A., B. S. Halpern, D. C. Reed, R. j. Orth. G. A. Kendrick, M. W. Beck, J. Belmaker, G. Krause, G. J Edgar, L. Airoldi et al., (2015) Upgrading marine ecosystem restoration using ecological concepts. Bioscience 66-156-163. |
| [2] | Ampumuza, C. (2011). Multi-level partnerships in Uganda’s Gorilla Tourism: Power, Processes and Poverty; the case of Bwindi Impenetrable National Park, Lap. Lambert, Academic publishing. |
| [3] | Aronson, J., and Alexander. P, (2013). Ecosystem restoration is now a global priority: time to roll up our sleeves. Restoration Ecology, 21: 293-296. |
| [4] | Aronson, J., Blingnaut, J., and Aronson, T. B. (2017). Conceptual frameworks and references for landscape scale restoration: Reflecting back and looking forward. Annals of the Missouri Botanical Garden. |
| [5] | Baker, J., Milner-Guilland, E, and Leader-Williams, N. (2012). Park gazettment and integrated conservation and development as factors in community conflict at Bwindi impenetrable Forest, Uganda. Conservation Biology, 26 (1); 160-170. |
| [6] | Beatty, C., Vidal, A., Kuzee, M., and Thomas, D. (2018). Accelerating biodiversity commitments through forest landscape restoration: Evidence from assessments in 26 countries using the Restoration opportunities Assessment Methodology (ROAM)- Working paper. |
| [7] | BenDor, T., Lester, T. W., Livengood, A., and Yonavjak, L., (2015). Estimating the size and impact of the ecological restoration economy. PloS one, 10 (60). |
| [8] | Besseau, P., Graham, S., and Christopherson, (2018). Restoring Forest landscapes: the key to sustainable future. IUFRO on behalf of the Global Partnership on Forest and Landscape restoration. Vienna, Austria. |
| [9] | Bitariho, R., (2015). Socio-economic and ecological implications of local people’s use of Bwindi forest in Southern western Uganda. University of Maryland, College Park, USA. |
| [10] | Bohlen, P., S. Lynch, L. Shabman, M. Clark, S. Shukla, and H. Swain. (2009). Paying for environmental services from agricultural lands: an example from the northern Everglades. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment 7: 46-55. |
| [11] | Boschman, E, E., and Cubbon, E., (2014). Sketch maps and qualitative GIS: using cartograpghics of individual spatial narratives in geographic research. Professional geographer 66 (2): 236-248. |
| [12] | Bosworth, A, Chaipraditkul, N., Cheng, M. M., Gupta, A., Junmookda, Kadam, P., Macer, D., Millet, C., Sangaroonthong, J and Walter, A. (Ethics and Biodiversity. Bangkok; UNESCO. |
| [13] | Brancalion, P. H., and hazdon, R. L. (2017). Beyond hectares: four principles to guide resforestation in the context of tropical forest and landscape restoration. Restoration ecology, 25 (4), 491-496. |
| [14] | Brall, C, Maeckelberghe, E, Porz, R, Makhoul J, Schoeder-Baeck, P., (2017) Research ethics 2; new perspective on norms, values and integrity in genomic research in times of even scarcer resources. Public Health genomics 20 (1) 27-35. |
| [15] | Brown, S., and Zarin, D., (2013). What does zero deforestoration mean? Science 342: 805-807. |
| [16] | Buijs, A. E. (2009). Public support for river restoration. A mixed method study into local resdents’ support for and framing of river management and ecological restoration in the Dutch flood plains. Journal of Environmental Management 90: 2680-2689. |
| [17] | Butynski, T. M, and Kalina, J. (1998). Gorilla tourism: A critical look. Conservation of Biological Resources. New York; Wiley, 294-313. |
| [18] | Carpenter, S. R. C, Folke, A. Norstron, O. Olsson, L. Schultz, B. Agarwal, P. Balvenera, Campbell, J. C, Castilla, W. Cramer, et al (2012). Program on ecosystem change nd society: an international research strategy for integrated social- ecological systems. Current opinion in Environmental Sustainability 4: 134-138. |
| [19] | CBD (2016). COP Decision XIII/5. Ecosystem restoration: short term action plan. Framework to help parties relevant to organizations and initiatives, to accelerate and upscale acivities on ecosystems restoration. It iams to support timely achievement of the strategic plan for biodiversity 2011-2020. |
| [20] | Chazdon, R. L. (2014). Second growth: the promise of tropical forest regeneration in an age of deforestation. University of Chicago Press. |
| [21] | Chazdon, R. L., Brancalion, P. H., Laestadius, L., Bennet-curry, A., Buckingham, K., Kumar, C., and Wilson, S. J. (2016). When is a forest a forest? Forest concepts and definitions in the era of forest and landscape restoration. Ambio, 45 (5), 538-550. |
| [22] | Chazdon, R., and Brancalion, P. (2019). Restoring forests as a means to many ends, Science, 365 (6448), 24-25. |
| [23] | Cinnner, J. E., Huchery, C., Hicks, C. C., Daw, T. W., Marshall, N., Wamukota, A., and Allison, E. H. (2015). Changes in adaptive capacity of Kenyan fishing communities. Nature Climate Change 5: 872-876. |
| [24] | Clewell, A. F., and Aronson, J. (2006). Motivations for the restoration of ecosystems. Conservation Biology 20: 420-428. |
| [25] | Cooper, C. B., Dickinson, J., Philips, T and Bonney, R, (2007). Citizen science as a tool for conservation in residential ecosystems. Ecology and society 12 (2); 11. |
| [26] | Costanza, R., d’Arge, R., de Groot, Farber, S., Grasso, B., Limburg, K., Naeem, S., O’Neil, R. V., Paruelo, J, Raskin, R. G., Sutton, P., and Van de Belt, M. (1997). The value of the world’s ecosystem services and natural capital. Nature 387: 253-260. |
| [27] | Crouzeilles, R., Ferreira, M. S., Chazdon, R. L., Lindernmayer, D. B., Sansevero, J. B., Monteiro, L., and Strassburg, B. B. (2017). Ecological restoration success is higher for natural regeneration than active restoration in tropical forests. Science advances, 3 (11). |
| [28] | Cutter, S. L., Barnes, L., Berry, M, Burton, C. Evans, E., Tate, E., and Webb, J. (2008). A place-based model for understanding community resilience to natural disasters. Global Environment Change 18: 598-606. |
| [29] | De Groot, R. S., Blingnaut, J. Van der Ploeg, S., Aronson, J., Elmqvist. T, and Farley, J. (2013). Benefits of investing in ecosystem restoration. Conservation Biology, 27: 1286-1293. |
| [30] | Dinerstein, E., Vynne, C., Sala, E., Joshi, A. R., Fernando, S., Loverjoy, T. F., and Burgess, N. D. (2019). A Global Deal For Nature for Nature: Guiding principles, milestones and targets. Science advances, 5 (4). |
| [31] | Elliot, M., Burdon, D., Hemingway K. L., and Apitz, S. E. (2007). Estuarine, coastal and marine ecosystem restoration: confusing management and science; revision of concepts. Estuarine Coastal and Shelf Science 74: 349-366. |
| [32] | Elston, D. E (2009). Charaterising community impacts of small dam removal: a case study of the Brownsville Dam. Thesis Oregon State university, Corvallis, Oregob USA. |
| [33] | Engle, N. L. (2001). Adaptive capacity and its assessment. Global Environment Change 21: 647-656. |
| [34] | FAO and WRI (2019). The road to restoration: A Guide to idendifying Priorities and Indicators for Monitoring Forest and Landscape Restoration: Rome, Washington, DC. |
| [35] | Farber, S., Costanza, R. M., Childers, J. Erickson, Gross, K., Hokinson, C. S., Kahn, J., Pincetl, S., Trov, A., Warren, P., and Wilson, M. (2006). Linking ecology and economics for ecosystem management. Bioscience. 56: 121-133. |
| [36] | FLORES Taskforce. (2019). Manila Declaration on Forest and Landscape Restoration. |
| [37] | Folke, C. (2006). Resilience: the emergence of a perspective for social-ecological system analysis. Global Environment Change. 16: 253-267. |
| [38] | Folke, C., Carpenter, S. R., Walker, B., Scheffer, M., Chapin, T., and Rockstrom, J. (2010). Resilience thinking: interesting resilience, adaptability and transformability. Ecology and Society 15 (4): 20. |
| [39] | France, R. L. (2016). From land to sea: governance management lesson from terrestrial restoration reaserch useful for developing and expanding sociological nature restoration. Ocean and coastal management 133: 64-71. |
| [40] | Gallopin, G. C. (2006). Linkages between vulnerability, resilience and adaptive capacity. Global environmental Change. 16: 293-303. |
| [41] | Hall, K. D., and Michel, E. R. (2002). Long term vegetation recovery on reclaimed coal surface mines in eastern USA. Journal of Applied Ecology 39: 960-970. |
| [42] | Hall, K. D., and Howath, R. B. (2000). Paving for restoration. Restoration Ecology. 8: 260-267. |
| [43] | Higgs, E. (2012) Human dimensions of ecological restoration: integrating science nature and culture. Island, Washington, D. C, USA. |
| [44] | Higgs, E, S., Harris, J. A., Hager, T., Hobbs, R. J., Murphy, S. D. and Suding, K. N. (2018). Keep ecological restoration open and flexible. Nature Ecology and Evolution 2: 580. |
| [45] | IPBES (2018). The IPBES assessment report on land degradation and restoration. Montanerella, L., Scholes, R., and Brainich, A (eds). Secretariat of the intergovernmental Science –Policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystems Services, Bonn, Germany. |
| [46] | IUCN, (2017). Assessing IUCN’s contribution to Uganda’s forest landscape restoration process. Forest landscape Restoration Opportunity Assessment for Uganda. |
| [47] | Kasangaki, A., Babasa, D., Bitariho, R., Eilu Gerald, (2003). Gap characteristics and regeneration in Bwindi Impenetrable National Park. African Journal of Ecology 42 (3): 217-224. |
| [48] | Kasangaki, R., Bitariho, P. Shaw, M., Robbins L., and McNeilage (2012). Ecological and socio-economic changes in and around Bwindi Impenetrable National Park. Nova Science Publishers, Inc. |
| [49] | Lubchenco, J., Barner, A. K., Cemmy-Chipman, and Reimer, J. H. (2015). Sustainabilty rooted in science. Nature Geoscience, 8: 741-745. |
| [50] | Martila, M., Kyllonen, K, and Karialainen (2016). Social access of in-stream habitat improvement from fisheries to enhancement to the delivery of multiple ecosystem services. Ecology and Society. 21 (1): 4. |
| [51] | Millenium Ecosystem Assessment {MEA}(2005). Ecosystems and human well-being: synthesis. Island, Washington, D. C., USA. |
| [52] | Mooney, H., Lariganderie, A., Cesario, M, Elmquist, T., HoeghGulgbrtg, O., Layorel, S., Mace, G. M., Paler, N., Scholes, R, and Yahara T (2009). Biodiversity, climate change and ecosystem services. Current Opinion in environmental sustainability. 1: 46-54. |
| [53] | Mukasa, N. (2017). The Batwa indigenous people in Uganda and their detachment from forest livelihood: land eviction and social plight. Deusto, Journal of Human rights 10: 71-74. |
| [54] | Mumby, P. J., Chollet, J., Bosec, Y, M., and Wolf, N. H (2014). Ecological resilience, robustness and vulnerability; how do these concepts benefit ecosystem management? Current opinion in Environmental Sustainability 7: 22-27. |
| [55] | Palmer, M. A., and Buhl, J. B, (2015). Aligning restoration science and the law to sustain ecological infrastructure for the future. Frontiers in Ecology and Environment 13; 512-519. |
| [56] | Reed, M. S., (2008). Stakeholders participation for environmental management: a literature review. Biology Conservation 141: 2417-2431. |
| [57] | Ruiz-Jean, M. C, and Aide T. M (2005). Restoration success: How is it being measured? Restoration Ecology 13: 569-577. |
| [58] | Society for Ecological Restoration. (2004). The SER international primer on ecological restoration. International Science and Policy Working Group. |
| [59] | Strushsaker, T. T, (1997). Ecology of an African rain Forest: Logging in Kibale and the conflict between conservation and exploitation. University press of Florida, Gainesville. |
| [60] | Tumusiime, D. M, and Svarstad, H. (2011). A local counter narrative on the conservation of mountain gorillas. Forum for Development Studies. Bosca raton: Taylor and Francis, pp 239-265. |
| [61] | Tumusiime, D. M, and Sjaastad, E. (2014). Conservation and development: Justice, inequality and attitudes around Bwindi Impenetrable National Park. Journal of development studies 50 (2) 204-225. |
APA Style
Wanyera Francis, Mutugi Chira Robert, Najma Dharani, Gichuki Nathaniel. (2022). Ecological Restoration as a Strategy to Ecosystem Conservation and Community Livelihood: A Case Study of Bwindi Impenetrable National Park. International Journal of Environmental Protection and Policy, 10(4), 109-117. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijepp.20221004.15
ACS Style
Wanyera Francis; Mutugi Chira Robert; Najma Dharani; Gichuki Nathaniel. Ecological Restoration as a Strategy to Ecosystem Conservation and Community Livelihood: A Case Study of Bwindi Impenetrable National Park. Int. J. Environ. Prot. Policy 2022, 10(4), 109-117. doi: 10.11648/j.ijepp.20221004.15
AMA Style
Wanyera Francis, Mutugi Chira Robert, Najma Dharani, Gichuki Nathaniel. Ecological Restoration as a Strategy to Ecosystem Conservation and Community Livelihood: A Case Study of Bwindi Impenetrable National Park. Int J Environ Prot Policy. 2022;10(4):109-117. doi: 10.11648/j.ijepp.20221004.15
Share This Article
Twitter
Linked In
Facebook
Copy
Download@article{10.11648/j.ijepp.20221004.15,
author = {Wanyera Francis and Mutugi Chira Robert and Najma Dharani and Gichuki Nathaniel},
title = {Ecological Restoration as a Strategy to Ecosystem Conservation and Community Livelihood: A Case Study of Bwindi Impenetrable National Park},
journal = {International Journal of Environmental Protection and Policy},
volume = {10},
number = {4},
pages = {109-117},
doi = {10.11648/j.ijepp.20221004.15},
url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijepp.20221004.15},
eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.ijepp.20221004.15},
abstract = {The study evaluated the strategies used to ensure the ecological process in Bwindi Impenetrable National park led to the regeneration of the fauna and flora as well as improved livelihood of the host community. The problem was that the ecological restoration in degraded areas was not efficiently done due to poor strategies used which affected the ecosystem regeneration as well as the local community livelihood. The study was guided by the specific objectives; to evaluate the restoration ecology trends of degraded fauna and flora species in the park; to assess approaches used to restore degraded fauna and flora species restored in the park; to ascertain the benefits of restoration of flora and fauna to both the park and the adjacent local community wellbeing. The study also hypothesized that anthropogenic activities had no drastic effect on ecosystem characteristics in the protected areas. The in depth literature reviewed was about the concepts and detailed information about ecological restoration and community livelihood. The methodology was descriptive and analytical while convenience sampling technique was used. The population of study was 60 whereas a sample had 40 households and 10 UWA staff. The data collection tools used included focus group discussions and interviews. The analysis of data was done by ANOVA to understand the extent of restoration and regeneration processes of ecosystems. The key results indicated that some fauna and flora species in the park were restored. The results revealed that specific restoration strategies used to stimulate regeneration had been applied. Additionally the study found out that the local community also benefited as a result of the ecological restoration process in the park. Conclusively, ecological restoration in Bwindi was practiced and has led to recovery of a number of fauna and flora species. It was recommended that the park should involve the key stakeholders in the ecological restoration process.},
year = {2022}
}
TY - JOUR T1 - Ecological Restoration as a Strategy to Ecosystem Conservation and Community Livelihood: A Case Study of Bwindi Impenetrable National Park AU - Wanyera Francis AU - Mutugi Chira Robert AU - Najma Dharani AU - Gichuki Nathaniel Y1 - 2022/08/26 PY - 2022 N1 - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijepp.20221004.15 DO - 10.11648/j.ijepp.20221004.15 T2 - International Journal of Environmental Protection and Policy JF - International Journal of Environmental Protection and Policy JO - International Journal of Environmental Protection and Policy SP - 109 EP - 117 PB - Science Publishing Group SN - 2330-7536 UR - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijepp.20221004.15 AB - The study evaluated the strategies used to ensure the ecological process in Bwindi Impenetrable National park led to the regeneration of the fauna and flora as well as improved livelihood of the host community. The problem was that the ecological restoration in degraded areas was not efficiently done due to poor strategies used which affected the ecosystem regeneration as well as the local community livelihood. The study was guided by the specific objectives; to evaluate the restoration ecology trends of degraded fauna and flora species in the park; to assess approaches used to restore degraded fauna and flora species restored in the park; to ascertain the benefits of restoration of flora and fauna to both the park and the adjacent local community wellbeing. The study also hypothesized that anthropogenic activities had no drastic effect on ecosystem characteristics in the protected areas. The in depth literature reviewed was about the concepts and detailed information about ecological restoration and community livelihood. The methodology was descriptive and analytical while convenience sampling technique was used. The population of study was 60 whereas a sample had 40 households and 10 UWA staff. The data collection tools used included focus group discussions and interviews. The analysis of data was done by ANOVA to understand the extent of restoration and regeneration processes of ecosystems. The key results indicated that some fauna and flora species in the park were restored. The results revealed that specific restoration strategies used to stimulate regeneration had been applied. Additionally the study found out that the local community also benefited as a result of the ecological restoration process in the park. Conclusively, ecological restoration in Bwindi was practiced and has led to recovery of a number of fauna and flora species. It was recommended that the park should involve the key stakeholders in the ecological restoration process. VL - 10 IS - 4 ER -
Email: