Work engagement is a vital force in the success of every organization. Having collectively involved and committed employees in the discharge of their functions improve organizational performance, enhances creativity, and strengthens relationships, consequently ensuring client satisfaction. This descriptive research aimed to determine and compare the employees’ work engagement levels before and during the COVID-19 pandemic. It sought to understand if this health crisis has changed their work engagement practices. It also explored if the employees’ levels of engagement varied when grouped according to the nature of their jobs. Data were collected through a survey with the entire population of employees of a private maritime institution in the Philippines for the academic years 2019-2020 and 2021-2022. The statistical analysis using the Mean, Standard Deviation, and t-Test of Independent Means revealed that, as a whole, the employees were very strongly engaged at work before and during the pandemic, and their levels of work engagement between these periods did not significantly differ. Administrative interventions in the form of technical, physical, moral, emotional, and financial support and well-managed employee engagement activities that could boost their mental and emotional wellness were recommended to mitigate the effect of a pandemic or crisis on employees’ engagement. The study recommends a follow-up investigation on employees’ engagement at work, considering other variables such as age, sex, tenure, and generational groupings. It also recommends a more objective assessment of employee work engagement with the list of criteria in harmony with the three pillars of the institution: instruction, research, and extension.
| Published in | Journal of Human Resource Management (Volume 11, Issue 1) |
| DOI | 10.11648/j.jhrm.20231101.13 |
| Page(s) | 13-22 |
| Creative Commons |
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited. |
| Copyright |
Copyright © The Author(s), 2023. Published by Science Publishing Group |
Employees’ Work Engagement, Administrative Support, COVID-19 Pandemic
| [1] | Adhitama, J., & Riyanto, S. (n.d.). Maintaining Employee Engagement and Employee Performance during COVID-19 Pandemic at PT Koexim Mandiri Finance. 6. |
| [2] | Ahmetoglu, G., Harding, X., Akhtar, R., & Chamorro-Premuzic, T. (2015). Predictors of creative achievement: Assessing the impact of entrepreneurial potential, perfectionism, and employee engagement. Creativity Research Journal, 27, 198–205. doi: 10.1080/10400419.2015.1030293. |
| [3] | Akour, A., Al-Tammemi, A. B., Barakat, M., Kanj, R., Fakhouri, H. N., Malkawi, A., & Musleh, G. (2020). The Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic and Emergency Distance Teaching on the Psychological Status of University Teachers: A Cross-Sectional Study in Jordan. The American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene, 103 (6), 2391–2399. https://doi.org/10.4269/ajtmh.20-0877 |
| [4] | Albercht, S. L., Bakker, A. B., Gruman, J. A., Macey, W. H., & Saks, A. M. (2015). Employee engagement, human resource management practices, and competitive advantage: An integrated approach. Journal of Organizational Effectiveness: People and Performance, 2, 7– 35. doi: 10.1108/joepp-08-2014-0042. |
| [5] | Amir, M. T., & Mangundjaya, W. L. (2021). How Resilience Affects Employee Engagement? A Case Study in Indonesia. The Journal of Asian Finance, Economics, and Business, 8 (2), 1147–1156. https://doi.org/10.13106/jafeb.2021.vol8.no2.1147 |
| [6] | Andrew, O. C., & Sofian, S. (2012). Individual factors and work outcomes of employee engagement. Procedia: Social and Behavioral Sciences, 40, 498–508. doi: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.03.222. |
| [7] | Anitha, J. (2014). Determinants of employee engagement and their impact on employee performance. International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, 63, 308–323. doi: 10.1108/ijppm-01-2013-0008. |
| [8] | Arora, A. K., & Srinivasan, R. (2020). Impact of Pandemic COVID-19 on the Teaching-Learning Process: A Study of Higher Education Teachers. Prabandhan: Indian Journal of Management, 13 (4), 43–56. https://doi.org/10.17010/pijom/2020/v13i4/151825 |
| [9] | Baker, C. N., Peele, H., Daniels, M., Saybe, M., Whalen, K., Overstreet, S., & The New Orleans, T.-I. S. L. C. (2021). The Experience of COVID-19 and Its Impact on Teachers’ Mental Health, Coping, and Teaching. School Psychology Review, 50 (4), 491–504. https://doi.org/10.1080/2372966X.2020.1855473 |
| [10] | Bakker, A. B. (2011). An Evidence-Based Model of Work Engagement. SagePub. Retrieved at https://www.edcomm.org.au/assets/Agora-PDFs/Banish-Teacher-Burnout/Further-reading/Bakker-2011.-An-evidence-based-model-of-work-engagement.pdf |
| [11] | Bakker, A. B., Demerouti, E., and Sanz-Vergel, A. I. (2014), “Burnout and work engagement: the JD-R approach,” Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior, Vol. 1 No. 1, pp. 389-411. |
| [12] | Barrick, M. R., Thurgood, G. R., Smith, T. A., & Courtright, S. H. (2014). Collective organizational engagement: Linking motivational antecedents, strategic implementation, and firm performance. Academy of Management Journal, 58, 111–135. doi: 10.5465/amj.2013.0227. |
| [13] | Blattner, J., & Walter, T. J. (2015). Creating and sustaining a highly engaged company culture in a multigenerational workplace. Strategic HR Review, 14, 124–130. doi: 10.1108/shr-06-2015- 0043. |
| [14] | Breevaart, K., Bakker, A., Hetland, J., Demerouti, E., Olsen, O. K., & Espevik, R. (2013). Daily transactional and transformational leadership and daily employee engagement. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 87, 138–157. doi: 10.1111/joop.12041. |
| [15] | Brown, A. (2018). Why is employee engagement so important? EngagementMultiplier. Retrieved at https://www.engagementmultiplier.com/blog/why-is-employee-engagement-so-important/ |
| [16] | Carter, B. (2015). 4 Dramatic shifts in the workplace that will positively affect employee engagement [Blog post]. Retrieved from http://blog.accessdevelopment.com/4- dramatic-shifts-in-the-workplace-that-will-positively-affect-employee-engagement |
| [17] | Cha, S. C. (2007). Research on structural modeling of enterprise employee engagement. Unpublished manuscript, Jinan University, Jinan, China. |
| [18] | Chiang, C.-F., & Hsieh, T.-S. (2012). The impacts of perceived organizational support and psychological empowerment on job performance: The mediating effects of organizational citizenship behavior. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 31 (1), 180–190. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhm.2011.04.011 |
| [19] | Cooper-Thomas, H. D., Paterson, N. L., Stadler, M. J., & Saks, A. M. (2014). The relative importance of proactive behaviors and outcomes for predicting newcomer learning, well-being, and work engagement. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 84, 318–331. doi: 10.1016/j.jvb.2014.02.007. |
| [20] | Diadjeng, W. (2021). Team Convergence in Prevention and Reduction of Stunting Rate in Malang District, East Java, Indonesia. Bioscience Biotechnology Research Communications, 14, 133–140. https://doi.org/10.21786/bbrc/14.5/26 |
| [21] | Eldor, L., & Harpaz, I. (2015). A process model of employee engagement: The learning climate and its relationship with extra-role performance behaviors. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 37, 213–235. doi: 10.1002/job.2037. |
| [22] | Emrouznejad, A., Anouze, A. L., & Thanassoulis, E. (2010). Using DEA, a semi-oriented radial measure for measuring the efficiency of decision-making units with negative data. European Journal of Operational Research, 200, 297–304. doi: 10.1016/j.ejor.2009.01.001. |
| [23] | Fang, L. T., Shi, K., & Zhang, F. H. (2010). A literature review on employee engagement. Management Review, 22 (5), 47-55. |
| [24] | Farndale, E., & Murrer, I. (2015). Job resources and employee engagement: A cross-national study. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 30, 610–626. doi: 10.1108/jmp-09-2013-0318. |
| [25] | Hargreaves, A., & Fullan, M. (2020). Professional capital after the pandemic: Revisiting and revising classic understandings of teachers’ work. Journal of Professional Capital and Community, 5 (3/4), 327–336. https://doi.org/10.1108/JPCC-06-2020-0039 |
| [26] | Harter, J. K., Schmidt, F. L., & Hayes, T. L. (2002). Business-unit-level relationship between employee satisfaction, employee engagement, and business outcomes: A meta-analysis. Journal of applied psychology, 87 (2), 268-279. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.87.2.268 |
| [27] | Hjelm, L., Handa, S., de Hoop, J., & Palermo, T. (2017). Poverty and perceived stress: Evidence from two unconditional cash transfer programs in Zambia. Social Science & Medicine, 177, 110–117. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2017.01.023 |
| [28] | Joshi, A., Vinay, M., & Bhaskar, P. (2020). Impact of coronavirus pandemic on the Indian education sector: Perspectives of teachers on online teaching and assessments. Interactive Technology and Smart Education, 18 (2), 205–226. https://doi.org/10.1108/ITSE-06-2020-0087 |
| [29] | Kahn, W. A. (1990). Psychological conditions of personal engagement and disengagement at work. Academy of management journal, 33 (4), 692-724. |
| [30] | Karanges, E., Johnston, K., Beatson, A., & Lings, I. (2015). The influence of internal communication on employee engagement: A pilot study. Public Relations Review, 41, 129–131. doi: 10.1016/j.pubrev.2014.12.003. |
| [31] | Kompaso, S. M., & Sridevi, M. S. (2010). Employee engagement: The key to improving performance. International Journal of Business and Management, 5, 89–98. doi: 10.5539/ijbm.v5n12p89. |
| [32] | Kulikowski, K., & Sedlak, P. (2020). Can you buy work engagement? The relationship between pay, fringe benefits, financial bonuses, and work engagement. Current Psychology, 39 (1), 343–353. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-017-9768-4 |
| [33] | La Guardia, J. G. (2009). Developing who I am: A self-determination theory approach to the establishment of healthy identities. Educational Psychologist, 44, 90–104. doi: 10.1080/00461520902832350. |
| [34] | Liu, Z. A. (2016). Study on the development of structure model of engagement for knowledge employee. Business management, 11, 65-69. http://dx.doi.org/10.13395/j.cnki.issn.1009-0061.2016.11.018 |
| [35] | Macey, W. H., & Schneider, B. (2008). The meaning of employee engagement. Industrial and Organizational Psychology, 1, 3-30. doi: 10.1111/j.1754- 9434.2007.0002.x. |
| [36] | Mäkikangas, A., Feldt, T., Kinnunen, U. and Mauno, S. (2013), “Does personality matter? Research on individual differences in occupational well-being”, in Bakker, A.B. (Ed.), Advances in Positive Organizational Psychology, Vol. 1, Emerald, Bingley, pp. 107-143. |
| [37] | May, D. R., Gilson, R. L., & Harter, L. M. (2004). The psychological conditions of meaningfulness, safety, availability, and the engagement of the human spirit at work. Journal of occupational and organizational psychology, 77 (1), 11-37. https://doi.org/10.1348/096317904322915892 |
| [38] | Meyer, J. P., Stanley, L. J., & Parfyonova, N. M. (2012). Employee commitment in context: The nature and implication of commitment profiles. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 80, 1–16. |
| [39] | Mishra, K., Boynton, L., & Mishra, A. (2014). Driving employee engagement: The expanded role of internal communications. International Journal of Business Communications, 51, 183–202. doi: 10.1177/2329488414525399. |
| [40] | Mowbray, P. K., Wilkinson, A., & Tse, H. H. M. (2014). An integrative review of employee voice: Identifying a common conceptualization and research agenda. International Journal of Management Reviews, 17, 382–400. doi: 10.1111/ijmr.12045. |
| [41] | Nasomboon, B. (2014). The relationship among leadership commitment organizational performance and employee engagement. International Business Research, 7, 77–90. doi: 10.5539/ibr.v7n9p77. |
| [42] | Nguyen, H. N., & Tran, M. D. (2021). The Effect of Perceived Organizational Support on Employee Engagement During the COVID-19 Pandemic: An Empirical Study in Vietnam. The Journal of Asian Finance, Economics, and Business, 8 (6), 415–426. https://doi.org/10.13106/jafeb.2021.vol8.no6.0415 |
| [43] | Onyema et al. (2020). Impact of Coronavirus Pandemic on Education. Journal of Education and Practice. https://doi.org/10.7176/JEP/11-13-12 |
| [44] | Ozamiz-Etxebarria, N., Idoiaga Mondragon, N., Bueno-Notivol, J., Pérez-Moreno, M., & Santabárbara, J. (2021). Prevalence of Anxiety, Depression, and Stress among Teachers during the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Rapid Systematic Review with Meta-Analysis. Brain Sciences, 11 (9), 1172. https://doi.org/10.3390/brainsci11091172 |
| [45] | Prasad, D. K., Vaidya, D. R. W., & Mangipudi, D. M. R. (2020). Effect of Occupational Stress and Remote Working on Psychological Well-Being of Employees: An Empirical Analysis during COVID- 19 Pandemic Concerning Information Technology Industry in Hyderabad. Indian Journal of Commerce and Management Studies, 11 (2), 1-13. |
| [46] | Prawitz, A., Garman, E., & Virginia. (2010). Employee financial distress, emotional health risk, and absenteeism. |
| [47] | Rasdi, R. M., Zaremohzzabieh, Z., & Ahrari, S. (2021). Financial Insecurity During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Spillover Effects on Burnout–Disengagement Relationships and Performance of Employees Who Moonlight. Frontiers in Psychology, 12. https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.610138 |
| [48] | Roberts, D. R., and Davenport, T. O. (2002) Job Engagement: Why it’s Important and how to improve it. Employment Relations Today, 21-29. |
| [49] | Saks, A. (2006). Antecedents and consequences of employee engagement. Journal of managerial psychology, 21 (7), 600-619. https://doi.org/10.1108/02683940610690169 |
| [50] | Saks, A., & Gruman, J. A. (2014). Making organizations more effective through organizational socialization. Journal of Organizational Effectiveness: People and Performance, 1, 261–280. doi: 10.1108/joepp-07-2014-0036. |
| [51] | Schaufeli, W. B., & Bakker, A. B. (2004). Utrecht work engagement scale: Preliminary manual. Utrecht university, 3-60. |
| [52] | Schaufeli, W. B. and Bakker, A. B. (2010), “Defining and measuring work engagement: bringing clarity to the concept,” in Bakker, A. B. and Leiter, M. P. (Eds), Work Engagement: A Handbook of Essential Theory and Research, Psychology Press, New York, NY, pp. 10-24. |
| [53] | Schaufeli, W. B., Salanova, M., Gonzalez-Roma, V. and Bakker, A. B. (2002), “The measurement of engagement and burnout: a two-sample confirmatory factor analytic approach,” Journal of Happiness Studies, Vol. 3 No. 1, pp. 71-92. |
| [54] | Sinclair, R. R., & Cheung, J. H. (2016). Money Matters: Recommendations for Financial Stress Research in Occupational Health Psychology. Stress and Health, 32 (3), 181–193. https://doi.org/10.1002/smi.2688 |
| [55] | Slack, F. J., Orife, J. N., & Anderson, F. P. (2010). Effects of commitment to corporate vision on employee satisfaction with their organization: An empirical study in the United States. International Journal of Management, 27, 421–436. |
| [56] | Society for Human Resource Management. (2016). Employee job satisfaction and engagement: Revitalizing a changing workforce. Retrieved from https://www.shrm.org/research/surveyfindings/ articles/pages/job-satisfaction-and-engagement-report-revitalizingchanging-workforce.aspx |
| [57] | Soane, E., Truss, C., Alfes, K., Shantz, A., Rees, C., & Gatenbytt, M. (2012). Development and application of a new measure of employee engagement: The ISA engagement scale. Human resource development international, 15 (5), 529-547. https://doi.org/10.1080/13678868.2012.726542 |
| [58] | Souba, W. W. (2011). The being of leadership. Philosophy, Ethics, and Humanities in Medicine, 6, 1–11. doi: 10.1186/1747-5341-6-5. |
| [59] | Stairs, M., & Galpin, M. (2010). Positive engagement: From employee engagement to workplace happiness. In P. A. Linley, S. Harrington, & N. Garcea (Eds.), Oxford library of psychology. Oxford handbook of positive psychology and work (p. 155–172). Oxford University Press. |
| [60] | Vandenabeele, W. (2014). Explaining public service motivation: The role of leadership and basic needs satisfaction. Review of Public Personnel Administration, 34, 153–173. doi: 10.1177/0734371x14521458. |
| [61] | Wainwright, B. (2018). What is employee engagement, and why is it important? My Effectory. Date retrieved: March 23, 2020, at https://www.effectory.com/knowledge/what-is-employee-engagement/ |
| [62] | Wang, D., & Chia-Chun, H. (2013). The effect of authentic leadership on employee trust and employee engagement. Social Behavior and Personality: An International Journal, 41, 613– 324. doi: 10.2224/sbp.2013.41.4.613. |
| [63] | Wellins, R., & Concelman, K. (2005). Creating a culture for engagement. Workforce performance solutions, 4, 1-5. |
| [64] | Xiao, M. L., & Duan, L. (2014). Job engagement of employees in state-owned enterprises: Construct clarification and scale development. Organizational management, 1, 35-41. http://dx.doi.org/10.16471/j.cnki.11-2822/c.2014.01.017 |
| [65] | Xu, L., Guo, Y. J., & Wang, Y. (2013). Empirical research on engagement structure of manufacturing employees based on structural equation modeling. Management world, 6, 59-62. http://dx.doi.org/10.13529/j.cnki.enterprise.economy.2013.06.002 |
APA Style
Emeliza Torrento Estimo, Michelle Jean Cadase Villanueva. (2023). Employees’ Work Engagement Before and During the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Comparative Analysis. Journal of Human Resource Management, 11(1), 13-22. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.jhrm.20231101.13
ACS Style
Emeliza Torrento Estimo; Michelle Jean Cadase Villanueva. Employees’ Work Engagement Before and During the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Comparative Analysis. J. Hum. Resour. Manag. 2023, 11(1), 13-22. doi: 10.11648/j.jhrm.20231101.13
AMA Style
Emeliza Torrento Estimo, Michelle Jean Cadase Villanueva. Employees’ Work Engagement Before and During the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Comparative Analysis. J Hum Resour Manag. 2023;11(1):13-22. doi: 10.11648/j.jhrm.20231101.13
Share This Article
Twitter
Linked In
Facebook
Copy
Download@article{10.11648/j.jhrm.20231101.13,
author = {Emeliza Torrento Estimo and Michelle Jean Cadase Villanueva},
title = {Employees’ Work Engagement Before and During the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Comparative Analysis},
journal = {Journal of Human Resource Management},
volume = {11},
number = {1},
pages = {13-22},
doi = {10.11648/j.jhrm.20231101.13},
url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.jhrm.20231101.13},
eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.jhrm.20231101.13},
abstract = {Work engagement is a vital force in the success of every organization. Having collectively involved and committed employees in the discharge of their functions improve organizational performance, enhances creativity, and strengthens relationships, consequently ensuring client satisfaction. This descriptive research aimed to determine and compare the employees’ work engagement levels before and during the COVID-19 pandemic. It sought to understand if this health crisis has changed their work engagement practices. It also explored if the employees’ levels of engagement varied when grouped according to the nature of their jobs. Data were collected through a survey with the entire population of employees of a private maritime institution in the Philippines for the academic years 2019-2020 and 2021-2022. The statistical analysis using the Mean, Standard Deviation, and t-Test of Independent Means revealed that, as a whole, the employees were very strongly engaged at work before and during the pandemic, and their levels of work engagement between these periods did not significantly differ. Administrative interventions in the form of technical, physical, moral, emotional, and financial support and well-managed employee engagement activities that could boost their mental and emotional wellness were recommended to mitigate the effect of a pandemic or crisis on employees’ engagement. The study recommends a follow-up investigation on employees’ engagement at work, considering other variables such as age, sex, tenure, and generational groupings. It also recommends a more objective assessment of employee work engagement with the list of criteria in harmony with the three pillars of the institution: instruction, research, and extension.},
year = {2023}
}
TY - JOUR T1 - Employees’ Work Engagement Before and During the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Comparative Analysis AU - Emeliza Torrento Estimo AU - Michelle Jean Cadase Villanueva Y1 - 2023/02/28 PY - 2023 N1 - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.jhrm.20231101.13 DO - 10.11648/j.jhrm.20231101.13 T2 - Journal of Human Resource Management JF - Journal of Human Resource Management JO - Journal of Human Resource Management SP - 13 EP - 22 PB - Science Publishing Group SN - 2331-0715 UR - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.jhrm.20231101.13 AB - Work engagement is a vital force in the success of every organization. Having collectively involved and committed employees in the discharge of their functions improve organizational performance, enhances creativity, and strengthens relationships, consequently ensuring client satisfaction. This descriptive research aimed to determine and compare the employees’ work engagement levels before and during the COVID-19 pandemic. It sought to understand if this health crisis has changed their work engagement practices. It also explored if the employees’ levels of engagement varied when grouped according to the nature of their jobs. Data were collected through a survey with the entire population of employees of a private maritime institution in the Philippines for the academic years 2019-2020 and 2021-2022. The statistical analysis using the Mean, Standard Deviation, and t-Test of Independent Means revealed that, as a whole, the employees were very strongly engaged at work before and during the pandemic, and their levels of work engagement between these periods did not significantly differ. Administrative interventions in the form of technical, physical, moral, emotional, and financial support and well-managed employee engagement activities that could boost their mental and emotional wellness were recommended to mitigate the effect of a pandemic or crisis on employees’ engagement. The study recommends a follow-up investigation on employees’ engagement at work, considering other variables such as age, sex, tenure, and generational groupings. It also recommends a more objective assessment of employee work engagement with the list of criteria in harmony with the three pillars of the institution: instruction, research, and extension. VL - 11 IS - 1 ER -
Email: