| Peer-Reviewed

Delivery an Effective Workplace: A Search into Malaysian Outsourcing Firms

Received: 3 May 2019     Accepted: 12 June 2019     Published: 26 June 2019
Views:       Downloads:
Abstract

The demand for better service delivery is fundamental with the heightened and ever changing expectations in customers. Performance and services reliability are source of competitive advantage; most firms lack the continuity in approach leading to performance excellence. This paper introduced a paradigm using nine influence factors to ensure excellence and deliverance of outsourcing goals. Outsourcing practice requires proactively quantum leap over the traditional limited strategies to give logical balance for quality services delivery. Over 150 Questionnaire were sent to Malaysian outsourcing firms. A total of 54 questionnaires were returned and analysed using multi variate statistics. The analyses had shown that the pattern and inclination in the firms’ strategy is appalling and not at the latitude for competitiveness and optimal services delivery. This inflexibility in strategy by most firms gave rise to resource under-utilization; wastages and this performance outlook cannot deliver effectiveness and sustain service delivery excellence. Managing facilities performance to corporate objectives and its continual improvement remain a challenge. The paper attempts to address the strategic gap in outsourcing services delivery using tactical and proactive approach in order to meet this era of choice and flexibility. Savvy customers are looking for reliability, quality services delivery with more value. The study recommends this model to ensure effectiveness and sustainable outsourcing service excellence this generation of ours punctuated by uncertainty and change.

Published in Science Journal of Business and Management (Volume 7, Issue 2)
DOI 10.11648/j.sjbm.20190702.12
Page(s) 51-58
Creative Commons

This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited.

Copyright

Copyright © The Author(s), 2019. Published by Science Publishing Group

Keywords

Facilities Management, Outsourcing, Strategy, Effectiveness, Performance, Excellence

References
[1] Daryl, D. G. & Jack McCann. (2011). Benchmarking a leadership model for the green economy’’ Benchmarking, 18 (3), 445-465.
[2] Abdulhamid I. M., Umbugala, M. D. & Hishammuddin M. A (2015). Company’s performance self-audit (COPSA) among facilities outsourcing firms in Malaysia. Strategic property management, 4 (1).
[3] Cooke, R. (2004), Walking Down the Outsourcing Aisle. Vancouver Board of Trade Sounding Board Magazine). Vancouver Board of Trade Sounding Board Magazine), Pp: 1.
[4] Umbugala, M. D. (2009). Timeless Practice framework as facilities management Outsourcing performance evaluation model. PHD thesis submitted in fulfillment for the award of degree of Doctor of philosophy (Facilities Management) at Universiti Teknologi Malaysia.
[5] NAFAM, (2007). National Asset and Facilities Management Convention, 13-14. Putra World Trade Centre Kuala Lumpur.
[6] Luke, C. Ng. (2011). Best Management Practices. Management Development, 30 (1), 93-105.
[7] Keith, A. & Martin, B. (2006), "community-based facilities management." Facilities Vol. 24 Nos 7 and 8 pp. 250-268.
[8] Kumar, A. & Sushi, S. (2013). ‘Modelling strategic performance factors for effective strategy execution’ I Productivity and performance management, 62 (6), 554-582.
[9] Umbugala, M. D. (2016) "Finding the niche towards performance excellence: A study of facilities management firms in Malaysia", Journal of Facilities Management, Vol. 14 Issue: 4, pp. 330-349.
[10] Kaplan, R. S., & Norton, D. P. (1996). The Balanced Score Card ' Translating Strategy into Action'. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
[11] Amarantunga, D. & Baldry, D. (2003). A conceptual framework to measure facilities management performance. 21 (2), 171-189.
[12] Simoes, J. M., Gomes, C. F., Yasin, M. M. (2011). A Conceptual Framework and Directions for future research. Quality in Maintenance Management, 17 (2), 116-137.
[13] Yiannis, K., Paul, H., Robert, E. M. (2012). “Pursuing ‘flexible commitment’ as strategic ambidexterity: an empirical justification in high technology firms’’ European journal of marketing, 46 (10) 1389-1417.
[14] Pitt. M, Chotipanich S, Amin. R & Issarasak. S. (2014) “Designing and managing the optimum strategic FM supply chain’’ Facilities Management, 12 (4), 330-336.
[15] Drucker, P. F. (2006). The Effective Executive ‘the definitive guide to getting the right thing done’ Printed in U. S. A. HarperCollins Publisher New York.
[16] Kaya, S., Christopher, A. H., Kirsten, A., Graham, B and Keith A. (2004). Raising Facilities Management's profile in organizations:. Facilities Management, 3 (1). 65-87.
[17] Best, R., Langston, C. & Gerard, D. (2003), Workplace Strategies: Facilities management, Butterworth Heinemann Elsevier Science LTD Oxford, UK.
[18] Dubem, I. K., Stephen, O. O. & Anthony, O. U. (2014) ‘’ An investigation on policy direction and drivers for sustainable facilities management practice in Nigeria’’ Facilities Management, 12 (3), 303-322.
[19] Roulac, S. & Heaney, G. (2005). Corporate Strategic Decision Making. Property Investment and Finance, 23 (4), 364-378.
[20] Umbugala, M. D., Hishamuddin, M. A., & Abdul Hamid, M. I. (2011). Sustainable Workplace ‘the Malaysia Experience'. 15th International Conference on ISO & TQM at Kajang Malaysia July 2011.
[21] Oosterom, M. (2007). The road ahead for public service delivery ‘Delivery on the customer promise’www.pwc.com. Pricewaterhousecoopers
[22] Singh, R. M., Mittal, K. A., Upadhyay, V. (2011). Benchmarking of North India urban water utilities. Benchmarking, 18 (1) 86-106.
[23] Ployhart E. Robert, Benjamin Schneider, & Schmitt, N. (2006). Staffing Organization 'contemporary practice & theory': 2006 by Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
[24] Burkholder, N. C. (2006) Outsourcing: The definitive view, applications and implications, John Willey and Sons Inc, Canada.
[25] Tito, C. (2011). ‘No Panaceas for Organizational Diseases, But Better Knowledge and Systems Thinking’ TQM, 23 (3), 252-267.
[26] Taiwo, J. G & Olugbenga T. (2015). Investigating experts’ opinion on outsourcing decision in FM Practice in public universities in Nigeria. Facilities Management, 13 (1), 27-44.
[27] Oakland, J. S. (2003). Total Quality Management 'text with cases' (3rd by Elsevier imprints Inc ed.). Amsterdam London New York: Butterworth Heinemann.
[28] Tucker, M., & Smith, A. (2007). User Perception in Workplace. Facilities, 26 (5/6), 196-212.
[29] DeSimone, J. M. & Werner, R. L. (2006), Human Resource Development. Printed in USA, Thompson South-Western Corporation.
[30] Behavior framework. (2017). htpp//www. Behaviors for Effective Service Delivery. North Yorkshire County Council.
[31] Brereton, G. R. (1992), Multivariate pattern recognition in chemo-metrics. (2nd Ed.) Elsevier science, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
[32] Kan, S. H. (2003). Metrics and Models 'Software & Quality Engineering (2 Ed.). USA, Toronto, London Singapore: Addison-Wesley Pearson Education Canada.
[33] Dunn, P. & Ronald, J. B. (2003), ‘The firm of the future’ John Willey and Sons Inc. published Canada. Printed in USA.
[34] Scheid, P. (2018). Service Delivery Monitoring Sub-Strategy. William Flora Hewlett Foundation. htpp//www.service delivery monetary sub-strategy.
[35] Stewart, J., Lohoar, S and Higgins D. (2011). Effective Practices for service Delivery Coordination in Indigenous Communities report No 8 Produced by Closing the Gap Clearinghouse.
[36] Blackmore, E., Vorley, B., Molenaar, J. W., Gorter, J., Heibron, L., Simon, L., Darlinger, J. (2015). How to Design an Effective Service Sector to Drive Sustainability in Small dominated sectors. Published by Aidenvironment, NewForesight and IIED.
[37] WMO Strategy For Service Delivery. http:www.wmo.int/pages/strategy.
[38] Duffy, A. H. B., & O'Donnell, F. J. (2005). Design Performance: British Library Cataloguing in Publication Data.
[39] Hui, E. Y. Y. & Tsang, A. H. C. (2004), "Sourcing Strategies of Facilities Management." Quality in Maintenance Vol. 10 No2, 85-92.
[40] Mohammed, M & Usmen M (2015). Improving universities Facilities Services using Six Sigma: A case study. Facilities Management, 13 (1) 65-87.
[41] Oyekunle. L. O, Windapo. A & Olabode. R. J (2015) ‘Measuring Strategic Performance in Construction Companies: a proposed integrated model’ Facilities Management, 13 (2).
[42] Sunday, J. O, Job, T. G., Mujidat, O. B. (2015). “Facilities Management practices in the Nigerian public universities” Facilities Management, 13 (1) 5-26.
[43] Blackmore, E., Vorley, B., Molenaar, J. W., Gorter, J., Heilbron, L., Simons, L., Dallinger, J. 2015. Service delivery: How to design an effective service sector to drive sustainability in smallholder dominated sectors. White Paper 3. Commissioned by IFC. Published by Aidenvironment, NewForesight and IIED.
[44] Gilleard, J. D. & Granath, J. A. (2007). Usability in the Workplace 'Case study of Pamela Youde Eastern Hospital, Hong Kong'. Paper presented at the CIB World Building conference.
[45] Gottschalk, P. (2006), e-Business Strategy 'Sourcing and Governance'. Hershey London, Melbourne Singapore, Idea Group Inc. Pp. 207.
[46] Hunter, J. Kelly. A. K. (2005), "Briefing from a facilities management perspective”, Facilities Vol. 23 Nos7 and 8, pp. 357.
[47] Jacqui, S., Shaun, L. and Daryl, H. (2011). Effective Practices for Service Delivery Coordination in Indigenous communities. Resource sheet no. 8, Produced by the Closing the Gap Clearinghouse.
[48] Wessel R. A. (2010). Towards corporate IT standard management ‘frameworks and solutions’ information science reference Hershey- New York.
Cite This Article
  • APA Style

    Umbugala Muhammad Douglas, Hishamuddin Bin Mohd Ali. (2019). Delivery an Effective Workplace: A Search into Malaysian Outsourcing Firms. Science Journal of Business and Management, 7(2), 51-58. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.sjbm.20190702.12

    Copy | Download

    ACS Style

    Umbugala Muhammad Douglas; Hishamuddin Bin Mohd Ali. Delivery an Effective Workplace: A Search into Malaysian Outsourcing Firms. Sci. J. Bus. Manag. 2019, 7(2), 51-58. doi: 10.11648/j.sjbm.20190702.12

    Copy | Download

    AMA Style

    Umbugala Muhammad Douglas, Hishamuddin Bin Mohd Ali. Delivery an Effective Workplace: A Search into Malaysian Outsourcing Firms. Sci J Bus Manag. 2019;7(2):51-58. doi: 10.11648/j.sjbm.20190702.12

    Copy | Download

  • @article{10.11648/j.sjbm.20190702.12,
      author = {Umbugala Muhammad Douglas and Hishamuddin Bin Mohd Ali},
      title = {Delivery an Effective Workplace: A Search into Malaysian Outsourcing Firms},
      journal = {Science Journal of Business and Management},
      volume = {7},
      number = {2},
      pages = {51-58},
      doi = {10.11648/j.sjbm.20190702.12},
      url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.sjbm.20190702.12},
      eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.sjbm.20190702.12},
      abstract = {The demand for better service delivery is fundamental with the heightened and ever changing expectations in customers. Performance and services reliability are source of competitive advantage; most firms lack the continuity in approach leading to performance excellence. This paper introduced a paradigm using nine influence factors to ensure excellence and deliverance of outsourcing goals. Outsourcing practice requires proactively quantum leap over the traditional limited strategies to give logical balance for quality services delivery. Over 150 Questionnaire were sent to Malaysian outsourcing firms. A total of 54 questionnaires were returned and analysed using multi variate statistics. The analyses had shown that the pattern and inclination in the firms’ strategy is appalling and not at the latitude for competitiveness and optimal services delivery. This inflexibility in strategy by most firms gave rise to resource under-utilization; wastages and this performance outlook cannot deliver effectiveness and sustain service delivery excellence. Managing facilities performance to corporate objectives and its continual improvement remain a challenge. The paper attempts to address the strategic gap in outsourcing services delivery using tactical and proactive approach in order to meet this era of choice and flexibility. Savvy customers are looking for reliability, quality services delivery with more value. The study recommends this model to ensure effectiveness and sustainable outsourcing service excellence this generation of ours punctuated by uncertainty and change.},
     year = {2019}
    }
    

    Copy | Download

  • TY  - JOUR
    T1  - Delivery an Effective Workplace: A Search into Malaysian Outsourcing Firms
    AU  - Umbugala Muhammad Douglas
    AU  - Hishamuddin Bin Mohd Ali
    Y1  - 2019/06/26
    PY  - 2019
    N1  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.sjbm.20190702.12
    DO  - 10.11648/j.sjbm.20190702.12
    T2  - Science Journal of Business and Management
    JF  - Science Journal of Business and Management
    JO  - Science Journal of Business and Management
    SP  - 51
    EP  - 58
    PB  - Science Publishing Group
    SN  - 2331-0634
    UR  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.sjbm.20190702.12
    AB  - The demand for better service delivery is fundamental with the heightened and ever changing expectations in customers. Performance and services reliability are source of competitive advantage; most firms lack the continuity in approach leading to performance excellence. This paper introduced a paradigm using nine influence factors to ensure excellence and deliverance of outsourcing goals. Outsourcing practice requires proactively quantum leap over the traditional limited strategies to give logical balance for quality services delivery. Over 150 Questionnaire were sent to Malaysian outsourcing firms. A total of 54 questionnaires were returned and analysed using multi variate statistics. The analyses had shown that the pattern and inclination in the firms’ strategy is appalling and not at the latitude for competitiveness and optimal services delivery. This inflexibility in strategy by most firms gave rise to resource under-utilization; wastages and this performance outlook cannot deliver effectiveness and sustain service delivery excellence. Managing facilities performance to corporate objectives and its continual improvement remain a challenge. The paper attempts to address the strategic gap in outsourcing services delivery using tactical and proactive approach in order to meet this era of choice and flexibility. Savvy customers are looking for reliability, quality services delivery with more value. The study recommends this model to ensure effectiveness and sustainable outsourcing service excellence this generation of ours punctuated by uncertainty and change.
    VL  - 7
    IS  - 2
    ER  - 

    Copy | Download

Author Information
  • Department of Estate Management, Faculty of Environmental Science, Baze University, Abuja, Nigeria

  • Department of Property Management, Faculty of Geoinformation & Real Estate, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, Johor, Malaysia

  • Sections