Mass Media Reform and Democratization in the Indonesian Context

Jamhur Poti; Mohd Khairie Ahmad

doi:doi:10.11648/j.ss.20211001.14

| Peer-Reviewed

Mass Media Reform and Democratization in the Indonesian Context

Jamhur Poti, Mohd Khairie Ahmad

Published in Social Sciences (Volume 10, Issue 1)

Received: 6 February 2021 Accepted: 24 February 2021 Published: 4 March 2021

Views: Downloads:

Download PDF

Share This Article

Twitter
Linked In
Facebook

Abstract

The reforms that took place in Indonesia in 1998 were the starting point for community demands for a democratic system. This article is a conceptual article that aims to answer the challenges of democratizing the mass media in the Indonesian context. For 32 years, the Indonesian government system tended to adhere to an autocratic system. The freedom of the mass media or the press is monitored, so that freedom of information and news is limited. So that the information that reaches the public has experienced distortion and is no longer relevant. So strong in autocratic regimes. However, after the 1998 reformation, democracy has made significant progress, with the fulfillment of the rights of civil society, there is a process of transferring authority which previously became the exclusive rights of the state to become the authority of the public. In line with this matlamat, the transition of the broadcast media system system is monitored by a government order that is free from pressure and interference with the interests of power. The mass media or the press is no longer the fourth pillar in democracy, but the mass media or the press is a part that must be guarded, because the mass media or the press represents itself as the main public space and also determines the dynamics that not only function socially and economically, but also function. ideological. Apart from that threats to mass media workers and journalists still occur, even though threats and violence are carried out more by group interests. In fact, democracy actually contains civilization and order in social life which has a very noble goal in running the government. In general, it can be said that a democratic system requires a very dynamic consensus and interaction between the state, the media industry, and the civil society. Because in a democratic system there is no institution that feels more dominant than others.

Published in	Social Sciences (Volume 10, Issue 1)
DOI	10.11648/j.ss.20211001.14
Page(s)	28-35
Creative Commons	This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited.
Copyright	Copyright © The Author(s), 2021. Published by Science Publishing Group

Keywords

Reform, Challenge, Mass Media Democracy

References

[1]	Abdullah, Lilis Puspitasari, 2018. Media Televisi Di Era Internet, Volume 2 Nomor 1, Maret 2018. hal 101-110 101.
[2]	Andriani, Nita, 2015. Peran Media Massa Nasional Dalam Politik Internasional. Jurnal INFORMASI Kajian Ilmu Komunikasi Volume 45. Nomor 1. Juni 2015. hal. 43-56.
[3]	Amartya, Sen. 2001 Development As Freedom. Oxford. New York: Alfred A. Knopf.
[4]	Arliman, 2017 Komisi Penyiaran Indonesia sebagai state auxiliari Bodies Yang Menyamin Siaran Yang Layak bagi Anak.
[5]	Armando, A. 2011 Televisi Jakarta Di Atas Indonesia Kisah Kegagalan Sistem Televisi Berjaringan, Jogjakarta: Penerbit Bentang, 2011.
[6]	Butar-Butar, 2015 Hedonisme arus balik demokrasi. Persatuan Wartawan Indonesia bekerjasama dengan Hari Pers Nasionan Pusat. PT. Semesta Rakyat Merdeka- Jakarta.
[7]	Bagir, Manan, 2014. Menjaga Kemerdekaan Pers di Pusaran Hukum. Dewan Pers Cetakan ke Tiga 2014. ISBN 978-603—8721-09-7 Jakarta.
[8]	CIPG (Critical for Innovation Policy & Governance), (2015), Tentang Media dan Demokrasi, Seri 4 rangkaian modul CREAME (Critical Research Methodology), CIPG.
[9]	Curran, James, 2000. Rethinking Media and Democracy, in James Curran and Michael Gurevitch, Mass Media And Society, Third Edition, Arnold London and Oxford University Press, New York.
[10]	Charles Tilly, 2011. Process and mecahnisme of Democratization, Source Sosiological Theory Vol. 1 (Marc, 2009) pp 1-16 Published by Aemrican Sosiological Association.
[11]	Freedom House, 2018. Freedom on the Net. Report. Washington DC: Freedom House.
[12]	Haqqu & Ersyad, 2020. Eksistensi Media Televisi Era Digital Dikalangan Remaja. Dinamika Sosial Budaya, Vol 22, No. 1, Juni 2020, pp 38-44 p-ISSN: 1410-9859& e-ISSN: 2580-8524 http://journals.usm.ac.id/index.php/jdsb
[13]	Haqqu, Risca, 2020 Era Baru Televisi Dalam Pandangan Konvergensi Media. Jurnal Rekam, Vol. 16 No. 1 - April 2020 Program Studi Ilmu Komunikasi, Fakultas Komunikasi dan Bisnis Telkom University.
[14]	Henry, S. 2011 Konstestasi Wacana tentang Sisitem Penyiaran yang Demokratis Pasca Oder Baru, Analisis Konstruksi Sosial, Relasi Negara, Industri Penyiaran dan Civil Society. Program Pascasarjana Desertas, Universitas Airlangga.
[15]	Hariyadi, Taufan. Runtuhnya Pilar Demokrasi Politik Kuasa Media Partai Perindo Di MNC Group. Conference on Dynamic Media, Communications, and Culture 2018 – 110. DiMCC Conference Proceeding, Vol. 1, 2018.
[16]	Habermas, J. 2010. Ruang publik: sebuah kajian, tentang kategori, masyarakat borjuis. Balesastra Pustaka.
[17]	LP3ES, Tim Redaksi. Jurnalisme Liputan 6: Antara Peristiwa dan Ruang Publik. Jakarta: Pustaka LP3ES Indonesia. 2006.
[18]	Meylda Adheista, Isma Nabilah, Muhammad Iqbal, Kepentingan Ekonomi Dan Politik Media Dalam Ruang Publik Indonesia. Jurnal AKRAB JUARA Volume 5 Nomor 2 Edisi Mei 2020 (1-17). Fakultas Ilmu Komunikasi Universitas Budi Luhur.
[19]	McQuail, Denis. 2011. Teori Komunikasi Massa McQuail, Edisi 6 Buku 1. Jakarta: Salemba Humanika.
[20]	Mujani Saiful, R William Widdle, Kuskrido Ambardhi, 2012. Kuasa Rakyat, Jakarta Erlangga.
[21]	Maulana, Menggali Kebijakan Penyiaran Digital di Indonesia. Jurnal Ilmu Komunikasi, Volume 17 Nomor 1, April 2019, halaman 60-72.
[22]	Nerawi, Sedu, (2009) An Analysis Of Islamic Conceptualisation of Press Freedom In Malaysia. University of Queensland.
[23]	Pembayun, 2017 Rekontruksi Pemikiran Habermasi Di Era Digital. Jurnal Komunikasi Media Massa Vol 1. No. 1. P-ISSN 2597 -7490. E-ISSN: 2598-2869.
[24]	Rianto, Puji. 2019. Comparing Authoritarianism and Democracy Paradigm in Mass Media Regulations in Indonesia. IPTEK-KOM, Vol. 21 No. 2, Desember 2019: 123 - 138 eISSN 2527 – 4902.
[25]	Rahmi, 2019, Kebebasan Pers Dan Demokrasi Indonesia. Jurnal Komunikasi dan Kebudayaan Volume 6, Nomor 1, April 2019 ISSN: 2443-3519 (hal. 78-85).
[26]	Restendy MS. Dinamika Produksi Media Cetak Dan Tantangan Industri Pers Di Indonesia. Jurnal Komunikasi Dan Penyiaran. P-ISSN 2721-964X / E-ISSN 2721-9631 Volume 1 Nomor 2 Juli 2020. Institut Agama Islam Sunan Kalijaga Malang-Indonesia.
[27]	Riyan Gunawan & Ahmadi Ahmadi, The Function of Mass Media in the Democracy State Perspective related to the Election Organization. Vol 4 No 4 (2018): L. Research Rev. Q. (November 2018) "Law and Democracy in General Election: Between Integrity and Law Part II".
[28]	Rivers, William L & Peterson, Theodore & Jensen Jay W, 2003, Media Massa dan Masyarakat Moderen, Prenada Media, Jakarta-Indonesia.
[29]	Sukmawati Dian & Ade Armando, Otoritas Komisi Penyiaran Indonesia Dalam Pengaturan Isi Siaran. Jurnal Komunikasi Global, Volume 8, Nomor 2, 2019.
[30]	Siregar. A, 2011. Democratic Governance dan Hak Azasi Manusia: Makna Kebebasan Pers dalam Otonomi Daerah. Jurnal Ilmu Sosial dan Ilmu Politik. Volume 14, Nomor 3, Maret 2011 (317-332) ISSN 1410-4946.
[31]	Solihat, M, 2015. Diverifikasi Media Massa Dan Demokrasi di Indonesia. Penguatan Peran Media Massa serta Masyarakat dalam Mewujudkan Demokrasi. Jurnal Ilmu Politik dan Komunikasi Volume V No. 2 / Desember 2015.
[32]	Severin, Werner J & Tankard, Jr, James W, 2005, Teori Komunikasi, Sejarah, Metode dan Terapan di Dalam Media Massa, Predana Media, Jakarta William Blum, 2013. Demokrasi Ekspor Amerika Paling Mematikan.
[33]	Susanto, 2013. Dinamika Komunikasi Politik Dalam Pemilihan Umm. Jurnal Kajian Komunikasi Vol. 1 No. 2. Desember 2013, hal. 163-172.
[34]	Vivian. J. 2008. Teori Komunikasi Massa (Edisi Kedelapan) Jakarta: Kencana https://databoks.katadata.co.id/datapublish/2018/06/26/tingkat-kepemirsaan-stasiun-televisi-siapa-unggul (diakses pada tanggal 22 Juli 2020).
[35]	Woluyo, 2018 Kebebasan Pers Di Era Reformasi. Majalah Ilmiah Semi Populer Komunikasi Massa Vol. 14 Nomor 1 (Jn-Juni 2018) Hal. 1-10.
[36]	Yulianti, Tika, 2020. Eksistensi Media Massa Konvesional Di Tengah Terpaan Media Baru (New Media). Jurnal Mediasi - Vol. 01, No. 01, Jakarta 2020. Pascasarjana Ilmu Komunikasi Universitas Mercu Buana Korespondensi: Jalan Meruya Selatan No. 1, Meruya Selatan, Jakarta Barat.
[37]	Zike Martha, Indria Flowerina, 2019. Proses Produksi Siaran Program Berita Pada Media. Jurnal MENARA Ilmu Vol. XIII No. 7 Juli 2019. ISSN 1693-2617 LPPM UMSB E-ISSN 2528-7613.
[38]	https://www.antaranews.com/berita/478819/malaysia-akui-pers-indonesia-lebih-bebas (diakses 20 Juli 2020).
[39]	https://rsf.org/en/ranking (diakses pada tanggal 22 Juli 2020.
[40]	http://cipg.or.id/wp-content/uploads/2015/06/MEDIA-1-Kebijakan-Media-2012.p

Cite This Article

Plain Text BibTeX RIS

APA Style

Jamhur Poti, Mohd Khairie Ahmad. (2021). Mass Media Reform and Democratization in the Indonesian Context. Social Sciences, 10(1), 28-35. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ss.20211001.14

Copy | Download

ACS Style

Jamhur Poti; Mohd Khairie Ahmad. Mass Media Reform and Democratization in the Indonesian Context. Soc. Sci. 2021, 10(1), 28-35. doi: 10.11648/j.ss.20211001.14

Copy | Download

AMA Style

Jamhur Poti, Mohd Khairie Ahmad. Mass Media Reform and Democratization in the Indonesian Context. Soc Sci. 2021;10(1):28-35. doi: 10.11648/j.ss.20211001.14

Copy | Download

@article{10.11648/j.ss.20211001.14,
  author = {Jamhur Poti and Mohd Khairie Ahmad},
  title = {Mass Media Reform and Democratization in the Indonesian Context},
  journal = {Social Sciences},
  volume = {10},
  number = {1},
  pages = {28-35},
  doi = {10.11648/j.ss.20211001.14},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ss.20211001.14},
  eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.ss.20211001.14},
  abstract = {The reforms that took place in Indonesia in 1998 were the starting point for community demands for a democratic system. This article is a conceptual article that aims to answer the challenges of democratizing the mass media in the Indonesian context. For 32 years, the Indonesian government system tended to adhere to an autocratic system. The freedom of the mass media or the press is monitored, so that freedom of information and news is limited. So that the information that reaches the public has experienced distortion and is no longer relevant. So strong in autocratic regimes. However, after the 1998 reformation, democracy has made significant progress, with the fulfillment of the rights of civil society, there is a process of transferring authority which previously became the exclusive rights of the state to become the authority of the public. In line with this matlamat, the transition of the broadcast media system system is monitored by a government order that is free from pressure and interference with the interests of power. The mass media or the press is no longer the fourth pillar in democracy, but the mass media or the press is a part that must be guarded, because the mass media or the press represents itself as the main public space and also determines the dynamics that not only function socially and economically, but also function. ideological. Apart from that threats to mass media workers and journalists still occur, even though threats and violence are carried out more by group interests. In fact, democracy actually contains civilization and order in social life which has a very noble goal in running the government. In general, it can be said that a democratic system requires a very dynamic consensus and interaction between the state, the media industry, and the civil society. Because in a democratic system there is no institution that feels more dominant than others.},
 year = {2021}
}

Copy | Download

TY  - JOUR
T1  - Mass Media Reform and Democratization in the Indonesian Context
AU  - Jamhur Poti
AU  - Mohd Khairie Ahmad
Y1  - 2021/03/04
PY  - 2021
N1  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ss.20211001.14
DO  - 10.11648/j.ss.20211001.14
T2  - Social Sciences
JF  - Social Sciences
JO  - Social Sciences
SP  - 28
EP  - 35
PB  - Science Publishing Group
SN  - 2326-988X
UR  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ss.20211001.14
AB  - The reforms that took place in Indonesia in 1998 were the starting point for community demands for a democratic system. This article is a conceptual article that aims to answer the challenges of democratizing the mass media in the Indonesian context. For 32 years, the Indonesian government system tended to adhere to an autocratic system. The freedom of the mass media or the press is monitored, so that freedom of information and news is limited. So that the information that reaches the public has experienced distortion and is no longer relevant. So strong in autocratic regimes. However, after the 1998 reformation, democracy has made significant progress, with the fulfillment of the rights of civil society, there is a process of transferring authority which previously became the exclusive rights of the state to become the authority of the public. In line with this matlamat, the transition of the broadcast media system system is monitored by a government order that is free from pressure and interference with the interests of power. The mass media or the press is no longer the fourth pillar in democracy, but the mass media or the press is a part that must be guarded, because the mass media or the press represents itself as the main public space and also determines the dynamics that not only function socially and economically, but also function. ideological. Apart from that threats to mass media workers and journalists still occur, even though threats and violence are carried out more by group interests. In fact, democracy actually contains civilization and order in social life which has a very noble goal in running the government. In general, it can be said that a democratic system requires a very dynamic consensus and interaction between the state, the media industry, and the civil society. Because in a democratic system there is no institution that feels more dominant than others.
VL  - 10
IS  - 1
ER  -

Copy | Download

Author Information

Jamhur Poti

Communication Department, School of Multimedia Technology & Communication, University Utara Malaysia, Kedah Darul Aman, Malaysia
Mohd Khairie Ahmad

Communication Department, School of Multimedia Technology & Communication, University Utara Malaysia, Kedah Darul Aman, Malaysia

Download PDF

Sections

Plain Text BibTeX RIS

APA Style

Jamhur Poti, Mohd Khairie Ahmad. (2021). Mass Media Reform and Democratization in the Indonesian Context. Social Sciences, 10(1), 28-35. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ss.20211001.14

Copy | Download

ACS Style

Jamhur Poti; Mohd Khairie Ahmad. Mass Media Reform and Democratization in the Indonesian Context. Soc. Sci. 2021, 10(1), 28-35. doi: 10.11648/j.ss.20211001.14

Copy | Download

AMA Style

Jamhur Poti, Mohd Khairie Ahmad. Mass Media Reform and Democratization in the Indonesian Context. Soc Sci. 2021;10(1):28-35. doi: 10.11648/j.ss.20211001.14

Copy | Download

@article{10.11648/j.ss.20211001.14,
  author = {Jamhur Poti and Mohd Khairie Ahmad},
  title = {Mass Media Reform and Democratization in the Indonesian Context},
  journal = {Social Sciences},
  volume = {10},
  number = {1},
  pages = {28-35},
  doi = {10.11648/j.ss.20211001.14},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ss.20211001.14},
  eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.ss.20211001.14},
  abstract = {The reforms that took place in Indonesia in 1998 were the starting point for community demands for a democratic system. This article is a conceptual article that aims to answer the challenges of democratizing the mass media in the Indonesian context. For 32 years, the Indonesian government system tended to adhere to an autocratic system. The freedom of the mass media or the press is monitored, so that freedom of information and news is limited. So that the information that reaches the public has experienced distortion and is no longer relevant. So strong in autocratic regimes. However, after the 1998 reformation, democracy has made significant progress, with the fulfillment of the rights of civil society, there is a process of transferring authority which previously became the exclusive rights of the state to become the authority of the public. In line with this matlamat, the transition of the broadcast media system system is monitored by a government order that is free from pressure and interference with the interests of power. The mass media or the press is no longer the fourth pillar in democracy, but the mass media or the press is a part that must be guarded, because the mass media or the press represents itself as the main public space and also determines the dynamics that not only function socially and economically, but also function. ideological. Apart from that threats to mass media workers and journalists still occur, even though threats and violence are carried out more by group interests. In fact, democracy actually contains civilization and order in social life which has a very noble goal in running the government. In general, it can be said that a democratic system requires a very dynamic consensus and interaction between the state, the media industry, and the civil society. Because in a democratic system there is no institution that feels more dominant than others.},
 year = {2021}
}

Copy | Download

TY  - JOUR
T1  - Mass Media Reform and Democratization in the Indonesian Context
AU  - Jamhur Poti
AU  - Mohd Khairie Ahmad
Y1  - 2021/03/04
PY  - 2021
N1  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ss.20211001.14
DO  - 10.11648/j.ss.20211001.14
T2  - Social Sciences
JF  - Social Sciences
JO  - Social Sciences
SP  - 28
EP  - 35
PB  - Science Publishing Group
SN  - 2326-988X
UR  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ss.20211001.14
AB  - The reforms that took place in Indonesia in 1998 were the starting point for community demands for a democratic system. This article is a conceptual article that aims to answer the challenges of democratizing the mass media in the Indonesian context. For 32 years, the Indonesian government system tended to adhere to an autocratic system. The freedom of the mass media or the press is monitored, so that freedom of information and news is limited. So that the information that reaches the public has experienced distortion and is no longer relevant. So strong in autocratic regimes. However, after the 1998 reformation, democracy has made significant progress, with the fulfillment of the rights of civil society, there is a process of transferring authority which previously became the exclusive rights of the state to become the authority of the public. In line with this matlamat, the transition of the broadcast media system system is monitored by a government order that is free from pressure and interference with the interests of power. The mass media or the press is no longer the fourth pillar in democracy, but the mass media or the press is a part that must be guarded, because the mass media or the press represents itself as the main public space and also determines the dynamics that not only function socially and economically, but also function. ideological. Apart from that threats to mass media workers and journalists still occur, even though threats and violence are carried out more by group interests. In fact, democracy actually contains civilization and order in social life which has a very noble goal in running the government. In general, it can be said that a democratic system requires a very dynamic consensus and interaction between the state, the media industry, and the civil society. Because in a democratic system there is no institution that feels more dominant than others.
VL  - 10
IS  - 1
ER  -

Copy | Download