The surface circulation in the Mozambique Channel changes from the northern part, where the system is under dominance of the monsoons, to the central and southern parts, where mesoscale eddies are more frequent. Despite these differences in the physics between the three regions, satellite-based primary production shows that the whole region is characterized by similar seasonal variability of primary production, in which winter is the most productive season. A coupled physical-biogeochemical model configuration applied for the Mozambique Channel is used to investigate how wind stress and heat fluxes modulate seasonally and spatially the distribution of new and primary production in the region. Higher new production integrated over the euphotic layer depth in winter accounts for about 50% of the total primary production in the Mozambique Channel, indicating the seasonality of primary production is driven by new nutrients upwelled from bellow the euphotic zone. During the other seasons of the year the depth-integrated primary production is low, which is the period when the system depends on remineralization of the organic matter to sustain phytoplankton growth at the subsurface. Stronger wind stress is the dominant surface forcing in the northern part of the Mozambique Channel, which is responsible for vertical advection and entrainment of nitrate from below the euphotic zone that sustain the primary production during winter, while intense negative net heat flux is the dominant forcing in the central/southern parts. However, it is important to note that mesoscale eddies also enhance primary productivity in the region with a focus on the winter period.
Published in | Journal of Water Resources and Ocean Science (Volume 10, Issue 3) |
DOI | 10.11648/j.wros.20211003.14 |
Page(s) | 51-57 |
Creative Commons |
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited. |
Copyright |
Copyright © The Author(s), 2021. Published by Science Publishing Group |
Wind Stress, Heat Fluxes, New Production, Primary Production, Mozambique Channel
[1] | Ullgren, J., van Aken, H., Ridderinkhof, H., de Ruijter, W., 2012. The hydrography of the Mozambique Channel from six years of continuous temperature, salinity, and velocity observations. Deep Sea Research Part I: Oceanographic Research Papers 69, 36–50. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dsr.2012.07.003. |
[2] | Saetre, R., Da Silva, A. J., 1982. Water masses and circulation of the Mozambique Channel. Revista de Investigação Pesqueira 3, 1–83. |
[3] | Sætre, R., Da Silva, A. J., 1984. The circulation of the Mozambique Channel. Deep Sea Research Part A. Oceanographic Research Papers 31 (5), 485–508. https://doi.org/10.1016/0198-0149(84)90098-0. |
[4] | Wyrtki, K., 1973. Physical oceanography of the Indian Ocean. In: The biology of the Indian Ocean. Springer, pp. 18–36. |
[5] | Lutjeharms, J., De Ruijter, W., Ridderinkhof, H., Van Aken, H., Veth, C., Van Leeuwen, P., Drijfhout, S., Jansen, J., Brummer, G., 2000. MARE and ACSEX: new research programmes on the Agulhas Current System. South African Journal of Science 96 (3), 105-110. |
[6] | De Ruijter, W. P., Ridderinkhof, H., Lutjeharms, J. R., Schouten, M. W., Veth, C., 2002. Observations of the flow in the Mozambique Channel. Geophysical Research Letters 29 (10), 140-143. https://doi.org/10.1029/2001GL013714. |
[7] | Schouten, M. W., de Ruijter, W. P., Van Leeuwen, P. J., Ridderinkhof, H., 2003. Eddies and variability in the Mozambique Channel. Deep Sea Research Part II: Topical Studies in Oceanography 50 (12), 1987–2003. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0967-0645(03)00042-0. |
[8] | Quartly, G., Srokosz, M., 2004. Eddies in the southern Mozambique Channel. Deep Sea Research Part II: Topical Studies in Oceanography 51 (1), 69–83. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dsr2.2003.03.001. |
[9] | McGillicuddy Jr, D., Robinson, A., 1997. Eddy-induced nutrient supply and new production in the Sargasso Sea. Deep Sea Research Part I: Oceanographic Research Papers 44 (8), 1427–1450. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0967-0637(97)00024-1. |
[10] | Franks, P. J., Wroblewski, J., Flierl, G. R., 1986. Prediction of phytoplankton growth in response to the frictional decay of a warm-core ring. Journal of Geophysical Research: Oceans 91 (C6), 7603–7610. https://doi.org/10.1029/JC091iC06p07603. |
[11] | Longhurst, A., 2001. A major seasonal phytoplankton bloom in the Madagascar basin. Deep Sea Research Part I: Oceanographic Research Papers 48 (11), 2413–2422. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0967-0637(01)00024-3. |
[12] | Ryther, J. H., Hall, J. R., Pease, A. K., Bakun, A., Jones, M. M., 1966. Primary organic production in relation to the chemistry and hydrography of the western Indian Ocean. Limnology and Oceanography 11 (3), 371–380. https://doi.org/10.4319/lo.1966.11.3.0371. |
[13] | Tew-Kai, E., Marsac, F., 2009. Patterns of variability of sea surface chlorophyll in the Mozambique Channel: a quantitative approach. Journal of Marine Systems 77 (1), 77–88. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmarsys.2008.11.007. |
[14] | Machu, E., Lutjeharms, J., Webb, A., Van Aken, H., 2002. First hydrographic evidence of the southeast Madagascar upwelling cell. Geophysical research letters 29 (21). https://doi.org/10.1029/2002GL015381. |
[15] | Jose, Y. S., Aumont, O., Machu, E., Penven, P., Moloney, C., Maury, O., 2014. Influence of mesoscale eddies on biological production in the Mozambique Channel: Several contrasted examples from a coupled ocean- biogeochemistry model. Deep Sea Research Part II: Topical Studies in Oceanography 100, 79–93. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dsr2.2013.10.018. |
[16] | Langa, A. A., Calil, P. H., 2020. On the role of physical processes on the surface chlorophyll variability in the northern Mozambique Channel. Ocean Dynamics 70 (1), 95–114. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10236-019-01311-0. |
[17] | Shchepetkin, A. F., McWilliams, J. C., 2005. The regional oceanic modeling system (ROMS): a split-explicit, free-surface, topography-following- coordinate oceanic model. Ocean Modeling 9 (4), 347–404. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ocemod.2004.08.002. |
[18] | Aumont, O., Maier-Reimer, E., Blain, S., Monfray, P., 2003. An ecosystem model of the global ocean including fe, si, p collimations. Global Biogeochemical Cycles 17 (2), 1060. https://doi.org/10.1029/2001GB001745. |
[19] | Aumont, O., Bopp, L., 2006. Globalizing results from ocean in situ iron fertilization studies. Global Biogeochemical Cycles 20 (2), 2017. https://doi:10.1029/2005GB002591. |
[20] | Behrenfeld, M. J., Falkowski, P. G., 1997. Photosynthetic rates derived from satellite-based chlorophyll concentration. Limnology and oceanography 42 (1), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.4319/lo.1997.42.1.0001. |
[21] | da Silva, A. J., 1986. River runoff and shrimp abundance in a tropical coastal ecosystem, the example of the Sofala Bank (Central Mozambique). In: The role of freshwater outflow in coastal marine ecosystems. Springer, pp. 329–344. |
[22] | Ramanantsoa, J. D., Krug, M., Penven, P., Rouault, M., Gula, J., 2018. Coastal upwelling south of Madagascar: Temporal and spatial variability. Journal of Marine Systems 178, 29–37. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmarsys.2017.10.005. |
[23] | McCreary, J., Murtugudde, R., Vialard, J., Vinayachandran, P., Wiggert, J. D., Hood, R. R., Shankar, D., Shetye, S., 2009. Biophysical processes in the Indian Ocean. Indian Ocean Biogeochemical Processes and Ecological Variability, 9–32. |
[24] | McGillicuddy, D. J., Robinson, A. R., Siegel, D. A., Jannasch, H. W., Johnson, R., Dickey, T. D., & Knap, A. H. (1998). Influence of mesoscale eddies on new production in the Sargasso Sea. Nature, 394 (6690), 263-266. https://doi.org/10.1038/28367. |
[25] | Jose, Y. S., Penven, P., Aumont, O., Machu, E., Moloney, C. L., Shillington, F., & Maury, O. (2016). Suppressing and enhancing effects of mesoscale dynamics on biological production in the Mozambique Channel. Journal of Marine Systems, 158, 129-139. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmarsys.2016.02.003. |
APA Style
Avelino Ângelo Adolfo Langa. (2021). Seasonal and Spatial Variability of Primary Production in the Mozambique Channel. Journal of Water Resources and Ocean Science, 10(3), 51-57. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.wros.20211003.14
ACS Style
Avelino Ângelo Adolfo Langa. Seasonal and Spatial Variability of Primary Production in the Mozambique Channel. J. Water Resour. Ocean Sci. 2021, 10(3), 51-57. doi: 10.11648/j.wros.20211003.14
AMA Style
Avelino Ângelo Adolfo Langa. Seasonal and Spatial Variability of Primary Production in the Mozambique Channel. J Water Resour Ocean Sci. 2021;10(3):51-57. doi: 10.11648/j.wros.20211003.14
@article{10.11648/j.wros.20211003.14, author = {Avelino Ângelo Adolfo Langa}, title = {Seasonal and Spatial Variability of Primary Production in the Mozambique Channel}, journal = {Journal of Water Resources and Ocean Science}, volume = {10}, number = {3}, pages = {51-57}, doi = {10.11648/j.wros.20211003.14}, url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.wros.20211003.14}, eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.wros.20211003.14}, abstract = {The surface circulation in the Mozambique Channel changes from the northern part, where the system is under dominance of the monsoons, to the central and southern parts, where mesoscale eddies are more frequent. Despite these differences in the physics between the three regions, satellite-based primary production shows that the whole region is characterized by similar seasonal variability of primary production, in which winter is the most productive season. A coupled physical-biogeochemical model configuration applied for the Mozambique Channel is used to investigate how wind stress and heat fluxes modulate seasonally and spatially the distribution of new and primary production in the region. Higher new production integrated over the euphotic layer depth in winter accounts for about 50% of the total primary production in the Mozambique Channel, indicating the seasonality of primary production is driven by new nutrients upwelled from bellow the euphotic zone. During the other seasons of the year the depth-integrated primary production is low, which is the period when the system depends on remineralization of the organic matter to sustain phytoplankton growth at the subsurface. Stronger wind stress is the dominant surface forcing in the northern part of the Mozambique Channel, which is responsible for vertical advection and entrainment of nitrate from below the euphotic zone that sustain the primary production during winter, while intense negative net heat flux is the dominant forcing in the central/southern parts. However, it is important to note that mesoscale eddies also enhance primary productivity in the region with a focus on the winter period.}, year = {2021} }
TY - JOUR T1 - Seasonal and Spatial Variability of Primary Production in the Mozambique Channel AU - Avelino Ângelo Adolfo Langa Y1 - 2021/06/26 PY - 2021 N1 - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.wros.20211003.14 DO - 10.11648/j.wros.20211003.14 T2 - Journal of Water Resources and Ocean Science JF - Journal of Water Resources and Ocean Science JO - Journal of Water Resources and Ocean Science SP - 51 EP - 57 PB - Science Publishing Group SN - 2328-7993 UR - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.wros.20211003.14 AB - The surface circulation in the Mozambique Channel changes from the northern part, where the system is under dominance of the monsoons, to the central and southern parts, where mesoscale eddies are more frequent. Despite these differences in the physics between the three regions, satellite-based primary production shows that the whole region is characterized by similar seasonal variability of primary production, in which winter is the most productive season. A coupled physical-biogeochemical model configuration applied for the Mozambique Channel is used to investigate how wind stress and heat fluxes modulate seasonally and spatially the distribution of new and primary production in the region. Higher new production integrated over the euphotic layer depth in winter accounts for about 50% of the total primary production in the Mozambique Channel, indicating the seasonality of primary production is driven by new nutrients upwelled from bellow the euphotic zone. During the other seasons of the year the depth-integrated primary production is low, which is the period when the system depends on remineralization of the organic matter to sustain phytoplankton growth at the subsurface. Stronger wind stress is the dominant surface forcing in the northern part of the Mozambique Channel, which is responsible for vertical advection and entrainment of nitrate from below the euphotic zone that sustain the primary production during winter, while intense negative net heat flux is the dominant forcing in the central/southern parts. However, it is important to note that mesoscale eddies also enhance primary productivity in the region with a focus on the winter period. VL - 10 IS - 3 ER -