This study endeavours to define evolutionary perspectives of emotions and mood on biological evolutionary platform. Emotions and Mood are two separate entities of the mental apparatus. 'Mood' is the energy level of the mind at a given particular moment, whereas 'emotion' is a specific sensation or feeling in the mind that provides directional drive to the other faculties of the mind – memory, intelligence, and physical activities – for their actions to be performed to pursue a specific goal. Present study supports that every emotion has been developed individually in the course of biological evolution, and they all have been evolved to maintain the survival needs. According to ‘Emotion Model’ posited by Das, each emotion is distinct and different with a specific survival role and physiologically can be qualitatively and quantitatively determined on different emotion scales. So there is no such existence of as such primary and secondary emotions. Furthermore, each emotion has some certain expressing habits, which both are suited for adapting with the emotion provoking situations and are used for inter-communication purposes. This study also clarifies how evolution of emotions has been an important tool in sociobiology maintaining the bridge between Darwin's evolution theory and Hamilton’s inclusive fitness theory, and has become responsible for entire social evolution.
Published in | Psychology and Behavioral Sciences (Volume 7, Issue 5) |
DOI | 10.11648/j.pbs.20180705.12 |
Page(s) | 89-96 |
Creative Commons |
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited. |
Copyright |
Copyright © The Author(s), 2018. Published by Science Publishing Group |
Emotions, Mood, Evolution, Sociobiology, Biological Evolution
[1] | Darwin C (1872). The Expression of The Emotions in Man and Animals. London: John Murray. |
[2] | Das K (2016). MIND: A Comprehensive Study on Mind and Its Dynamics. Kolkata: K P Basu Publishing Co. |
[3] | Plutchik R. ''A general psychoevolutionary theory of emotion''. In Emotion: Theory, research, and experience. Vol. 1 Theories of Emotion, (eds. Plutchik R & Kellerman H). New York: Academic Press, 1980. |
[4] | Panksepp J (1992). A critical role for ''affective neuroscience'' in resolving what is basic about basic emotions. Psychological Review; 99 (3): 554-560. |
[5] | Izard C E (1992). ''Basic emotions, relations among emotions, and emotion-cognition relations''. Psychological Review; 99 (3): 561-565. |
[6] | Ekman P (1992). ''Are there basic emotions?''. Psychological Review; 99 (3): 550-553. |
[7] | Ekman P (1999). ''An argument for basic emotions''. Cognition and Emotion; 6 (3): 169-200. |
[8] | Ortony A, Turner T J (1990). ''What's basic about basic emotions ?''. Psychological Review; 97 (3): 315-331. |
[9] | Turner T J, Ortony A (1992). ''Basic emotions: can conflicting criteria converge ?''. Psychological Review; 99 (3): 566-571. |
[10] | Das K K (2017). "A Theoretical Approach to Define and Analyze Emotions". International Journal of Emergency Mental Health; 19 (4): 374, 1-14. |
[11] | Das K K (2018). "Therapeutic Reprocessing of Association of Memories (TRAM)". International Journal of Emergency Mental Health; 20 (2): 376, 1-7. |
[12] | Darwin C (1859). On the Origin of Species by Means of Natural Selection, or the Preservation of Favoured Races in the Struggle for Life. London: John Murray. |
[13] | Wilson E O (1975). Sociobiology: The New Synthesis. Cambridge: Harvard University Press. |
[14] | Hamilton W (1964). "The Genetical Evolution of Social Behaviour. I & II". Journal of Theoretical Biology; 7 (1): 1-16 & 17-52. |
[15] | Dawkins R (1976). The Selfish Gene. Oxford University press. |
[16] | Dawkins R (1982). The Extended Phenotype. Oxford University Press. |
[17] | Wang J, Wurm Y. Nipiwattanaphon M, Riba-Grognuz O, Huang Y, Shoemaker D, Keller L (2013). "A Y-like chromosome causes alternative colony organization in fire ants". Nature; 493 (7434): 664-668. |
[18] | Queller D C, Ponte E, Bozzaro S, Strassmann J E (2003). "Single-gene greenbeard effects in the social amoeba Dictyostelium discoideum". Science; 299 (5603): 105-106. |
[19] | Sinervo B, Chaine A, Clobert J, Calsbeek R, Hazard L, Lancaster L, McAdam A G, Alonzo S, Corrigan G, Hochberg M E (2006). "Self-recognition, color signals, and cycles of greenbeard mutualism and altruism". Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America; 103 (19): 7372-7377. |
[20] | Smukalla S, Caldara M, Pochet N, Beuvais A, Guadagnini S, Yan C, Vinces M, Jansen A, Prevost M, Latge J, Fink G, Foster K, Verstrepen K (2008). "FLO1 is a Variable Green-Beard Gene that Drives Biofilm-like Cooperation in Budding Yeast". Cell; 135 (4): 726-737. |
[21] | Trivers R L (1971). "The Evolution of Reciprocal Altruism". The Quarterly Review of Biology; 46 (1): 35-57. |
[22] | Smith J M, Price G R (1973). "The Logic of Animal Conflict". Nature; 246 (5427): 15-18. |
[23] | Smith J M (1982). Evolution and the Theory of Games. Cambridge University Press. |
[24] | Axelrod R (1984). The Evolution of Cooperation. Basic Books. |
[25] | Sadock J B, Sadock V A, Ruiz P (2015). Kaplan and Sadock's Synopsis of Psychiatry, Behavioral Sciences/Clinical Psychiatry; 11th Ed. Philadelphia PA: Wolters Kluwer; page 347. |
[26] | Weiss H M, Cropanzano R (1996). ''A theoretical discussion of the structure, causes and consequences of affective experiences at work''. In Research in Organizational Behavior; vol. 18 (eds. Staw B M & Cummings L L). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press; page 17-19. |
[27] | Ekman P (1994). ''Moods, emotions, and traits''. In The nature of emotion: Fundamental questions; (eds. Ekman P & Davidson R J). New York: Oxford University Press. |
APA Style
Krishanu Kumar Das. (2018). A Study on Evolutionary Perspectives of ‘Emotions’ and ‘Mood’ on Biological Evolutionary Platform. Psychology and Behavioral Sciences, 7(5), 89-96. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.pbs.20180705.12
ACS Style
Krishanu Kumar Das. A Study on Evolutionary Perspectives of ‘Emotions’ and ‘Mood’ on Biological Evolutionary Platform. Psychol. Behav. Sci. 2018, 7(5), 89-96. doi: 10.11648/j.pbs.20180705.12
AMA Style
Krishanu Kumar Das. A Study on Evolutionary Perspectives of ‘Emotions’ and ‘Mood’ on Biological Evolutionary Platform. Psychol Behav Sci. 2018;7(5):89-96. doi: 10.11648/j.pbs.20180705.12
@article{10.11648/j.pbs.20180705.12, author = {Krishanu Kumar Das}, title = {A Study on Evolutionary Perspectives of ‘Emotions’ and ‘Mood’ on Biological Evolutionary Platform}, journal = {Psychology and Behavioral Sciences}, volume = {7}, number = {5}, pages = {89-96}, doi = {10.11648/j.pbs.20180705.12}, url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.pbs.20180705.12}, eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.pbs.20180705.12}, abstract = {This study endeavours to define evolutionary perspectives of emotions and mood on biological evolutionary platform. Emotions and Mood are two separate entities of the mental apparatus. 'Mood' is the energy level of the mind at a given particular moment, whereas 'emotion' is a specific sensation or feeling in the mind that provides directional drive to the other faculties of the mind – memory, intelligence, and physical activities – for their actions to be performed to pursue a specific goal. Present study supports that every emotion has been developed individually in the course of biological evolution, and they all have been evolved to maintain the survival needs. According to ‘Emotion Model’ posited by Das, each emotion is distinct and different with a specific survival role and physiologically can be qualitatively and quantitatively determined on different emotion scales. So there is no such existence of as such primary and secondary emotions. Furthermore, each emotion has some certain expressing habits, which both are suited for adapting with the emotion provoking situations and are used for inter-communication purposes. This study also clarifies how evolution of emotions has been an important tool in sociobiology maintaining the bridge between Darwin's evolution theory and Hamilton’s inclusive fitness theory, and has become responsible for entire social evolution.}, year = {2018} }
TY - JOUR T1 - A Study on Evolutionary Perspectives of ‘Emotions’ and ‘Mood’ on Biological Evolutionary Platform AU - Krishanu Kumar Das Y1 - 2018/12/20 PY - 2018 N1 - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.pbs.20180705.12 DO - 10.11648/j.pbs.20180705.12 T2 - Psychology and Behavioral Sciences JF - Psychology and Behavioral Sciences JO - Psychology and Behavioral Sciences SP - 89 EP - 96 PB - Science Publishing Group SN - 2328-7845 UR - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.pbs.20180705.12 AB - This study endeavours to define evolutionary perspectives of emotions and mood on biological evolutionary platform. Emotions and Mood are two separate entities of the mental apparatus. 'Mood' is the energy level of the mind at a given particular moment, whereas 'emotion' is a specific sensation or feeling in the mind that provides directional drive to the other faculties of the mind – memory, intelligence, and physical activities – for their actions to be performed to pursue a specific goal. Present study supports that every emotion has been developed individually in the course of biological evolution, and they all have been evolved to maintain the survival needs. According to ‘Emotion Model’ posited by Das, each emotion is distinct and different with a specific survival role and physiologically can be qualitatively and quantitatively determined on different emotion scales. So there is no such existence of as such primary and secondary emotions. Furthermore, each emotion has some certain expressing habits, which both are suited for adapting with the emotion provoking situations and are used for inter-communication purposes. This study also clarifies how evolution of emotions has been an important tool in sociobiology maintaining the bridge between Darwin's evolution theory and Hamilton’s inclusive fitness theory, and has become responsible for entire social evolution. VL - 7 IS - 5 ER -