In medical practice, no one professional can perform the service independently. In clinical work, doctors and nurses need to communicate harmoniously and cooperate to effectively complete the treatment or nursing behavior for patients. However, communication between doctors and nurses is not as smooth as expected due to different statuses and unclear division of labor. Good communication is an effective guarantee for the smooth completion of work. On this premise, accidents can be avoided in the process of activities, and work quality and efficiency can be significantly improved. Reflection refers to the analysis of a problem from different angles, to conclude guiding future work practice. Taylor's reflective model is divided into four steps: construction, deconstruction, face, and reconstruction. Based on Taylor's model, the author reflects on his own experience by combining hegemonism, social criticism theory, and communicative behavior theory. Discuss the problems that may exist among medical staff and find the root causes through analysis. Further study on how to effectively communicate with doctors in the future work to reach a consensus, provide medical and nursing services for patients in the most efficient way, improve service quality and improve the doctor-patient relationship.
| Published in | World Journal of Public Health (Volume 7, Issue 2) |
| DOI | 10.11648/j.wjph.20220702.13 |
| Page(s) | 56-60 |
| Creative Commons |
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited. |
| Copyright |
Copyright © The Author(s), 2022. Published by Science Publishing Group |
Transforming Professional Practice, Reflection, Communication, Taylor's Model
| [1] | Angulo Rasco, J. F. A qué llámanos evaluación? Las distintas acepciones del términos evaluación o por qué no todos los conceptos significan lo mismo. [J]. Teoría Y Desarrollo Del currículum. Aljibe, Málaga, 1994: 283–296. |
| [2] | ANECA. Programa de Convergencia Europea. El crédito Europeo. [J]. Agencia Nacional para la Evaluación de la Calidad Educativa, Madrid., 2003. |
| [3] | López Pascual, M., Barba Martín, J. J. La participación del alumnado en la evaluación: la autoevaluación, la coevaluación y la evaluación compartida. [J]. Rev. Tándem Didáctica Educ. Fís, 2005, 17: 21–37. |
| [4] | Fernández, J. M. La Auto-Evaluación (y la auto-calificación) como Formas de Promoción Democrática. In: Moral, C. (Ed.), En Materiales de Formación del Profesorado Universitario. [J]. Guía III, UCUA, Granada, 2003: 97. |
| [5] | Matziou V, Vlahioti E, Perdikaris P, et al. Physician and nursing perceptions concerning interprofessional communication and collaboration [J]. Journal of Interprofessional Care, 2014, 28 (6): 526–533. |
| [6] | Whitehead D, Davis P. The issue of medical dominance (hegemony) [J]. Journal of Orthopaedic Nursing, 2001, 5 (3): 114–115. |
| [7] | Taylor, B. Reflective Practice for Healthcare Professionals [M]. New York: Open University Press., 2010. |
| [8] | Brown S S, Lindell D F, Dolansky M A, et al. Nurses’ professional values and attitudes toward collaboration with physicians [J]. Nursing Ethics, 2015, 22 (2): 205–216. |
| [9] | Mahboube et al. Comparing the attitude of doctors and nurses toward the factor of collaborative relationships. [J]. Family Med Prim Care, 2019, 8 (10): 3263–3267. |
| [10] | House S, Havens D. Nurses’ and Physicians’ Perceptions of Nurse-Physician Collaboration: A Systematic Review [J]. JONA: The Journal of Nursing Administration, 2017, 47 (3): 165–171. |
| [11] | Habermas J. The theory of communicative action [J]. Boston: Beacon, 1984. |
| [12] | Schaefer M, Heinze H-J, Rotte M, et al. Communicative versus Strategic Rationality: Habermas Theory of Communicative Action and the Social Brain [J]. B. J. Harrison. PLoS ONE, 2013, 8 (5): e65111. |
| [13] | Carvalho D P de S R P, Vitor A F, Cogo A L P, et al. Theory of communicative action: a basis for the development of critical thinking [J]. Revista Brasileira de Enfermagem, 2017, 70 (6): 1343–1346. |
| [14] | Loveday C, Lord H, Ellwood L, et al. Teamwork and social cohesion are key: Nurses’ perceptions and experiences of working in a new decentralised intensive care unit [J]. Australian Critical Care, 2020: S1036731420302605. |
| [15] | Edwards P B, Rea J B, Oermann M H, et al. Effect of Peer-to-Peer Nurse–Physician Collaboration on Attitudes Toward the Nurse–Physician Relationship: [J]. Journal for Nurses in Professional Development, 2017, 31 (1): 13–18. |
| [16] | Krenz H, Burtscher M J, Grande B, et al. Nurses’ voice: the role of hierarchy and leadership [J]. Leadership in Health Services, 2020, 33 (1): 12–26. |
| [17] | de Vries J, Timmins F. Care erosion in hospitals: Problems in reflective nursing practice and the role of cognitive dissonance [J]. Nurse Education Today, 2016, 38: 5–8. |
| [18] | Fay B. Critical social science: Liberation and its limits [J]. New York: Cornell University Press, 1987. |
| [19] | Dickinson J K. A CRITICAL SOCIAL THEORY APPROACH TO NURSING CARE OF ADOLESCENTS WITH DIABETES [J]. Issues in Comprehensive Pediatric Nursing, 1999, 22 (4): 143–152. |
| [20] | Price B. Applying critical thinking to nursing [J]. Nursing Standard, 2015, 29 (51): 49–60. |
| [21] | Boutain D. M. Critical Nursing Scholarship: Exploring Critical Social Theory with African American Studies. [J]. Advances in Nursing Science, 1999, 21 (4): 37–47. |
| [22] | Sj W. Medical Hegemony [J].: 2. |
| [23] | Knupp A M, Patterson E S, Ford J L, et al. Associations Among Nurse Fatigue, Individual Nurse Factors, and Aspects of the Nursing Practice Environment: [J]. JONA: The Journal of Nursing Administration, 2018, 48 (12): 642–648. |
| [24] | Liu X, Zheng J, Liu K, et al. Associations of nurse education level and nurse staffing with patient experiences of hospital care: A cross sectional study in China [J]. Research in Nursing & Health, 2020, 43 (1): 103–113. |
| [25] | Von Colln-Appling C, Giuliano D. A concept analysis of critical thinking: A guide for nurse educators [J]. Nurse Education Today, 2017, 49: 106–109. |
APA Style
Jian He, Yue Wen, Yi Zhou, Chulei Ji. (2022). How to Use Emancipatory Reflection to Guide Professional Practice at Work. World Journal of Public Health, 7(2), 56-60. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.wjph.20220702.13
ACS Style
Jian He; Yue Wen; Yi Zhou; Chulei Ji. How to Use Emancipatory Reflection to Guide Professional Practice at Work. World J. Public Health 2022, 7(2), 56-60. doi: 10.11648/j.wjph.20220702.13
Share This Article
Twitter
Linked In
Facebook
Copy
Download@article{10.11648/j.wjph.20220702.13,
author = {Jian He and Yue Wen and Yi Zhou and Chulei Ji},
title = {How to Use Emancipatory Reflection to Guide Professional Practice at Work},
journal = {World Journal of Public Health},
volume = {7},
number = {2},
pages = {56-60},
doi = {10.11648/j.wjph.20220702.13},
url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.wjph.20220702.13},
eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.wjph.20220702.13},
abstract = {In medical practice, no one professional can perform the service independently. In clinical work, doctors and nurses need to communicate harmoniously and cooperate to effectively complete the treatment or nursing behavior for patients. However, communication between doctors and nurses is not as smooth as expected due to different statuses and unclear division of labor. Good communication is an effective guarantee for the smooth completion of work. On this premise, accidents can be avoided in the process of activities, and work quality and efficiency can be significantly improved. Reflection refers to the analysis of a problem from different angles, to conclude guiding future work practice. Taylor's reflective model is divided into four steps: construction, deconstruction, face, and reconstruction. Based on Taylor's model, the author reflects on his own experience by combining hegemonism, social criticism theory, and communicative behavior theory. Discuss the problems that may exist among medical staff and find the root causes through analysis. Further study on how to effectively communicate with doctors in the future work to reach a consensus, provide medical and nursing services for patients in the most efficient way, improve service quality and improve the doctor-patient relationship.},
year = {2022}
}
TY - JOUR T1 - How to Use Emancipatory Reflection to Guide Professional Practice at Work AU - Jian He AU - Yue Wen AU - Yi Zhou AU - Chulei Ji Y1 - 2022/04/26 PY - 2022 N1 - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.wjph.20220702.13 DO - 10.11648/j.wjph.20220702.13 T2 - World Journal of Public Health JF - World Journal of Public Health JO - World Journal of Public Health SP - 56 EP - 60 PB - Science Publishing Group SN - 2637-6059 UR - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.wjph.20220702.13 AB - In medical practice, no one professional can perform the service independently. In clinical work, doctors and nurses need to communicate harmoniously and cooperate to effectively complete the treatment or nursing behavior for patients. However, communication between doctors and nurses is not as smooth as expected due to different statuses and unclear division of labor. Good communication is an effective guarantee for the smooth completion of work. On this premise, accidents can be avoided in the process of activities, and work quality and efficiency can be significantly improved. Reflection refers to the analysis of a problem from different angles, to conclude guiding future work practice. Taylor's reflective model is divided into four steps: construction, deconstruction, face, and reconstruction. Based on Taylor's model, the author reflects on his own experience by combining hegemonism, social criticism theory, and communicative behavior theory. Discuss the problems that may exist among medical staff and find the root causes through analysis. Further study on how to effectively communicate with doctors in the future work to reach a consensus, provide medical and nursing services for patients in the most efficient way, improve service quality and improve the doctor-patient relationship. VL - 7 IS - 2 ER -
Email: